Southern Brave

[Pilchards]

First game on Wednesday.

Doesn't feel like a Southern team with only two Hampshire players in.

Southern have Jamie Smith, Rew, Pepper, Rashid and Abel.

Great bowling attack but the batting feels weak IMHO.

 

[Lighthouse]

1 hour ago, Pilchards said:

First game on Wednesday.

Doesn't feel like a Southern team with only two Hampshire players in.

Southern have Jamie Smith, Rew, Pepper, Rashid and Abel.

Great bowling attack but the batting feels weak IMHO.

 

Nah, that definitely sounds like a Hampshire team.

[Hodgey]

By my count there is one Hampshire player (Lumsden) and one Sussex player who barely plays for them (Archer). I’m not having Stubbs. So much for the early talk of it being linked to the counties. We do have 3 Surrey players though.

they’ve also managed to get 4 wicket keepers ! 

not sure I agree with you on the batting - Pepper, Miller, Stoinis, Smith, Rew and Stubbs can all whack it about on their day.

you’ve also got a load of lower order clubbers in Jordan, Archer, Worrel, Rashid who are all more than capable.

looks a decent side to me, but as pointed out none of these have really played together so will need to gel quickly.

Seems to be more stars this year connected to the various multi-owner franchises, not sure any of these sides have any real connection to their counties anymore in terms of players - they all seem to have swapped sides. 

[Pilchards]

Impressive comments and yes maybe the batting line up could be good if gelled together.

Does feel weird that Vince is playing for London while Sonny Baker, Dawson for Manchester I think.

Lets see how it goes this evening.

 

[badgerx16]

The sooner this pantomime is over, the better.

[Window Cleaner]

14 hours ago, Hodgey said:

By my count there is one Hampshire player (Lumsden) and one Sussex player who barely plays for them (Archer). I’m not having Stubbs. So much for the early talk of it being linked to the counties. We do have 3 Surrey players though.

they’ve also managed to get 4 wicket keepers ! 

not sure I agree with you on the batting - Pepper, Miller, Stoinis, Smith, Rew and Stubbs can all whack it about on their day.

you’ve also got a load of lower order clubbers in Jordan, Archer, Worrel, Rashid who are all more than capable.

looks a decent side to me, but as pointed out none of these have really played together so will need to gel quickly.

Seems to be more stars this year connected to the various multi-owner franchises, not sure any of these sides have any real connection to their counties anymore in terms of players - they all seem to have swapped sides. 

That's right. The Hundred has distanced itself from regular cricket. I don't care, can't follow it anyway,well apart from looking at the scores.

[Lighthouse]

Welsh Fire Men just sounds like a calendar you'd buy your mother in law fo Christmas.

[Gloucester Saint]

We’ll see what the wicket’s like when they bat on it but not an inspiring start.

Smith got a peach from Cook but he’s also shit. Stubbs carrying on his brilliant contribution from Finals Day. At least Thomas Rew and David Miller can bat (even if Miller is almost old enough to be Rew’s dad). 

Edited 4 hours ago by Gloucester Saint

[Pilchards]

11 hours ago, badgerx16 said:

The sooner this pantomime is over, the better.

What about you don’t watch it if you’re not happy with it?

 

[badgerx16]

54 minutes ago, Pilchards said:

What about you don’t watch it if you’re not happy with it?

 

i don't watch it. I just think it is a totally unnecessary imposition on the cricketing calendar.

Edited 2 hours ago by badgerx16

[Hodgey]

Pilchards - I’m giving it another couple of games but early indications side with you !

Not sure why they started with McKinney - I thought he was squad filler like Lumsden. Can only assume Pepper is injured.

Didnt watch much of it but what I saw was pretty boring with a bored crowd. 
 

Also not sure about home advantage when none of your players play there…..