Jump to content

Ex Lion Tamer

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    2,601
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ex Lion Tamer

  1. Er ok, the answer to your question is yes, I do think someone who works 50% harder should get 50% more money. If we could measure the amount of hard work that, for example, a nurse does, and ensure they earn the same as a investment banker who works that hard, that would be great. But such a system is literally impossible, so I don't understand why you asked the question.
  2. I take the point that it would reduce tax avoidance but I can't help feeling it would nevertheless lead to either far lower total tax revenues or a far greater burden on the poor, depending what level it is set at. Willing to see any evidence otherwise
  3. Your question clearly implies that you think that people should be paid 50% more for working 50% harder. But due to all the other factors, such a system is impossible. So why ask the question? Also, how does someone work 50% harder than someone else? How do you measure that? Yes, you clearly take things very literally if you thought I wanted everyone in the UK to earn exactly the same amount of money.
  4. Its such a hilarious misconception to think that the amount people earn correlates to how hard they work. Upbringing, education, innate intelligence, luck, mental health and chosen industry are all just as important, if not more. Also, your first point is confusing. No one is saying that there shouldn't be some people with more money than others - just that the gap needs to be reduced.
  5. If too much money is concentrated at the top, then the middle and working classes don't have as much to spend on goods and services, so companies are less likely to be profitable, and the economy is less likely to grow.
  6. Well the UK has a high level of inequality compared to most countries, so we're obviously not redistributing enough. Also this article says: "In the most controversial finding, the study concludes that redistributing wealth, largely through taxation, does not significantly impact growth unless the intervention is extreme." I don't think our tax levels would be classed as extreme.
  7. http://www.theguardian.com/business/2014/feb/26/imf-inequality-economic-growth What say our resident forum economic experts? Will the penny finally drop that the argument against taxing the rich is an ethos propagated by the rich themselves for personal gain, rather than something that is rooted in reality?
  8. He was good but the Fonz was always the one with the star quality, so they managed fine without him
  9. When Cortese quit, everyone was expecting our season to nosedive and we ended up playing great. I reckon this will be 0-0 though, WHAM have really tightened up at the back
  10. Where did you hear this? The agent thing is apparently why Ravel Morrison wanted to go to Fulham, according to an article in the Guardian the other day
  11. Surely the mistake is selling a 20 year old for next to nothing when he's only had 11 games to prove himself
  12. It is fairer to take the whole squad into account though. Without VW and Gaston we would have been weaker over the course of the season. Also I expect our wage bill is higher than average
  13. Let's win the cup, it's worth it whatever happens. Your optimism about next season is admirable but really, we're not going to spend loads of money in the summer. Let's take our chance while we've got a great team.
  14. He did a great job for Espanyol under difficult circumstances until it went wrong in the last season. He is very well thought of in Spain
  15. Obviously the biggest issue is transfer policy this summer. But aside from that I'm keen to know if we will get stripes back next season, and wonder if there is anything that can be done to ensure the idea is in the directors' heads before the decision is made
  16. I thank UKIP for splitting the right like the left has been split for years. Finally we might get an even contest
  17. I just don't understand why you sign a player with his history and then baulk at the first sign of trouble. We knew he had this side, having made the decision to sign him we should be taking the rough with the smooth and getting him back in the team scoring goals to make up for it.
  18. So was Jermaine Wright good after all?
  19. What would Rupert Lowe have got us?
  20. So what sort of committee is it if individual members are signing players? And was Mopo just sitting in silence?
  21. Working tax credits are a completely different thing to the minimum wage and have been around in one form or another for much longer http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Working_tax_credit http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Minimum_Wage_Act_1998
  22. Letting him go on loan last season is the reason we got relegated
  23. It is possible to take tough decisions where necessary while also recognising that your staff will perform better if they are working in a pleasant environment
  24. Seems like a good way to get the profit that Katherina (allegedly) wants, without hurting the team too badly
  25. There's utilising a source, and then there's phrases like "dream-wrecker!" He's a gutter journalist. And I say that as someone who defended the Echo that time
×
×
  • Create New...