Alanh

Wrapping the booking fee into the ticket price is the opposite of transparent. At least when it is split out you can see how much each transaction is. The issue that you can't avoid here is that there is only one place to buy the ticket, so it's not a free market. Saints could charge £5 booking fee but we would all still have to buy from them.

The booking fee basically covers the booking system software, the financial transaction processing costs, plus the maintenance of those systems. Unsurprisingly the provision of those elements of the service are not free, but they are a lot more efficient and cheaper than employing people to answer the phones to take orders and then mail out paper tickets.

Their debt will have some sort of repayment timeframe against it. They may have paid off some of that debt with revenue from last year and what was left over (after all of the other costs) was their annual profit.

Success in football is largely driven by talent and application. My guess is that if he's good enough he'll get the sort of moves that Dibling and Livramento got but at the moment he's discovering whether he can match their success while earning (allegedly) £20K a week. That's not a bad position to work from.

This. The most frustrating thing all afternoon was watching Flynn Downes getting into positions where he could not receive the ball becuase he was marked or there was an opponent between him and the ball. That issue was fundamental to the problems we had until he was subbed off.

We've just added Quarshie to the ranks of our centre backs, without selling one. All the signs are that we will lose one / two of the other CBs - ABK and Bednarek most likely - so there you have a perfect example of what you want to happen, and complain isn't happening.

Isn't that the case for every single football club in the country? For example, Man City were every pundit's favourites to win the league this year because they were so dominant last year and Liverpool were supposed to be a work in progress due to a new manager and minimal new signings. Look how those two situations are working out.

There was definitely risk in letting the ball roll, but if he had completed it successfully, he would have been away from the nearest opponents and we would have been breaking at speed. All ifs and buts unfortunately, but I can see why AM saw the opportunity.

I'm not convinced he is ever going to dominate in the air i.e. get on the end of loads of crosses. He doesn't seem to jump or naturally time his headers. I think he will be outdone inthe air by most centrebacks in the top teams. He does have decent feet though and I can see him causing problems for defences if he can get up to speed. Shame his work on Sunday was all in the middle of the pitch as we rarely had the ball near their goal.

Probably the best performance of the season by Saints against a team that is one of the best in the world at pressing and putting their opponents under pressure in their own defensive third. I've seen most of the teams in the league this season make the sort of mistake that led to their first goal so it's short sighted to just blame it on RM. If Fernandes decides to let the ball roll across his body and travel upfield with it he takes out about 4 Liverpool players and we are on the attack. He didn't and played it back and te rest is history. Personally I'm putting the majority of the blame on FD as he had a clear chance to put it out for a throw, rather than put it back into the centre of the goal. Compare that to the criticism a keeper would rightly get on here for pushing a shot back into the middle of the goal. Good performances all over the pitch. PO showed up more than I've ever seen before, it was just a shame his best work was done in the middle of the pitch. I'm stll not convinced he's a classic target man, as I don't think he won more than a couple of headers all game. I'm pretty sure the wind played a part in the second goal - probably held it up a bit allowing Salah to reach it ahead of AM. It may also have had a role in the third if Suga misjudged the flight of the ball.

Can't see us buying 4 new midfielders - your numbers 2, 5 and 6. Assuming we buy Downes and Fraser I think we'll then loan a keeper as a starter because we still see Baz as the future, buy a LB, ST and AM. For me the big money needs to go one Downes (or an equivalent if WHam won't sell) followed by a striker. I'm happy enough if that big money is in the form of a loan if a permanent buy is out of our reach in terms of funds. Leaves a squad something like (playing either 4-3-3 or 5-3-2): GK - New loan, Baz, Lumley Def - KWP, ABK, THB, Jan, Jack, Bree, Manning, New LB Mid - Ghoddos, Downes, Smallbone, Aribo, New AM, Lallana, Charles Attack - Adarma, Stewart, New striker, Frazer, Edozie, SAA, Sule I'm assuming the DCC, Onuachu, Alcaraz, Perraud don't return from their loans / we sell them.

I think Lallana is being brought in for two key reasons (among others). Firstly exceptionally positive PL experience. He hasn't just got the underdog / survivors mentality, he knows what it feels like and is required to win the thing. Secondly, he can retain possession, which is going to be very important to Russ as we are going to be under a lot more pressure from opponents next season. That ability might help in situations where we want to control the game - perhaps hang onto a slim lead.

Four very good teams all messing up a different times of the season. We did our howlers in Sept and Feb, they are doing theirs now. I think you meant testement rather than parmount 😉

It wouldn't surprise me if Leicester fail to win any if their remaining four games. Their form has really fallen off a cliff.

No idea who is saying this but if Plan B is better than Plan A, surely it becomes Plan A by default.