Jump to content

Chez

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    23,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Chez

  1. lazy goalscorer. I just could never get my head round that.
  2. Chez

    Jack Cork

    my guess would be that we will need to either have sold Lallana/Surman, cut a deal with Euell or loaned out Saga and Dyer again before we can afford the Cork loan.
  3. perhaps McClaggan can fill that right wing position. I wonder i Dyer will work to regain his place or moan at losing it?
  4. amen. Smith is weak, a bottler and I don't want him pussyfooting in front of me for the rest if the season. As for strikers perhaps we do need numbers. Robertson is not the answer though.
  5. whats wrong with playing Patterson up front? It worked yesterday and he has looked good in every game I have seen him in so far.
  6. none more so than from me. He certainly had a good game yesterday though and one header that prevented a certain goal certainly had me applauding him. Having said all that he is still weak as **** in the air which has been found out on several occassions already.
  7. Bridge None. Pele, very doubtful indeed.
  8. bit tired and hung over, sorry, but that was is as clear as mud. I'll lighten up though. Our bunnies are taking us down, that is something Alpine and i both agree on. Hang on I joined this thread all positive about the performance and now I'm leaving it depressed at the reality that we are going down. Bugger.
  9. maybe, but he loaned him in the first place so why not extend it?
  10. I honestly have no idea what you are talking about. I don't even see a post from you on this thread.
  11. I judge each post on its merit. By contrast he appears to conclude that anyone with anything positive to say is delusional.
  12. go back through the thread and tell me where people are being delusional. A decent performance is met with "we were crap". Not we ARE crap, but we WERE crap. I don't care if the poster was there or not today, either way they are talking utter ****e. We were decent, end of.
  13. I don't know anything about that but I do know he likes calling people delusional and happy clappy despite the people in question being neither. By using such names he trys to discredit posters answers, but anyone with a bit about them can see right through that.
  14. who comes in full stop. Pulis?
  15. Pele to return?
  16. out wide yes, but in the middle Gobern looks ready.
  17. Cork is going back to Chelsea tomorrow to discuss extending the loan.
  18. For me it was the inclusion of Patterson up front. The ball stuck and we could then play further up the field. In addition Gobern and Gillett protecting the back four much better. My greatest fear against united is the space their wide men will get. Our full backs must get better protection from the wide men. Holmes and Smith offered little. McClaggen worked well going both ways, less so BWP.
  19. thanks for that post. That is how I wanted to sum things up.
  20. if he Bale II then he is more than welcome.
  21. he was tired, his work rate dropped off a lot after 50 minutes. Holmes and Smith were playing as wingers and McGoldrick said in the post match interview that he "liked playing in the hole". The formation was exactly the same as last week.
  22. you're the jinx!
  23. absolutely. Boy could we do with a fit Thomas to sell.
  24. I doubt you will find any Saints fan that doesn't think we will either be relegated or will struggle to survive. Your post is therefore just a pathetic attempt to paint supporters that went and enjoyed the game today as `happy clappy'.
  25. they played teh exact same game as at their place - booting it long down the channels. They were slightly more effective than at the Madjeski but we just kept the ball better. They do not have a big man up front which is where we struggle. Coppell sppeared to have not learned a thing from watching us last time and also on Sky and didn't expose ou weaknesses at all. Credit where credit is due we played well and largely didn't allow them to play their own game
×
×
  • Create New...