Decent right up - welcome point but really surprised Tadic didn't take a couple of extra touches before hitting the pen
http://www.theguardian.com/football/2015/mar/15/chelsea-southampton-premier-league-match-report?CMP=twt_gu
Wow rewrite history why don't you - always found him to be pretty straight and at the time he pointed out his sources so it was up to us whether or not we believed him.
I don't think any player has left this club under such undignified and questionable circumstances, both in terms of what he said and did. Deserves to be roundly booed in my opinion. Lovren I would ignore, Lambert I would cheer.
He is an habitual fibber, can't even resign without telling a lie. Used to quite like the bloke having met him but I would rather put my trust in a cheap Chinese watch.
I am a little confused what this actually means.
Is it a case that should we want to make the deal permanent the fee is agreed at the time of the loan but it is still dependant on the player agreeing to it? Pretty much what I assume was the case with Bertrand. But do the selling club have the right to say no actually we don't want to sell to you as say A Madrid could do with Alderweireld. And can another club enter the market and gazump? I assume a lot of clubs must be looking at Toby and would like to buy him this summer and if they offer him more we lose our option? Basically I guess the question I am asking is just how watertight are these options to buy and are they worth the paper they are written on.