Nolan

Yes, but attempting to reform the institution looking into the anti-semitism in their party isnt the best looking way of dealing with it. https://www.politicshome.com/news/uk/political-parties/labour-party/news/108205/labour-accused-‘undermining’-anti-semitism-probe

I take it you disagree with women being able to wear what they want then, Locksy?

Have you actually read his article "Denmark has got it wrong. Yes, the burka is oppressive and ridiculous – but that's still no reason to ban it"?

I'm unsure if that's a parody post Shroppie.... Are you being serious? The reason the story moved back onto anti semitism is because there wasn't a story in the NHS.

Oh, Jonny.... You're not very good at this are you. Speaking on the election campaign trail during a visit to Cornwall, Johnson was asked if he would apologise for the Islamophobia that has taken place in his party. "Of course, and for all the hurt and offence that has been caused,? he responded. "And all that is intolerable and it's so important as a country that we don't allow that kind of thing and that's why we're going to have the independent inquiry. We are going to have an independent inquiry into Islamophobia, anti-Semitism, every manner of prejudice and discrimination and it will start before Christmas," he said. Source: https://www.msn.com/en-in/news/other/boris-johnson-apologises-for-islamophobia-in-his-party-pledges-inquiry/ar-BBXqunE

"I'm sorry for what was said" , is very different to "I'm sorry if you were upset by what was said". He says the latter. It is what is known as a 'non-apology'. "Member of Labour put up for interview on Radio 4's Today programme by Labour, defends Labour shocker"

Apologising for hurt caused by something that is said IS NOT apologising for the thing that is said. You are saying 'I'm sorry you find this offensive'.

Why on earth are people sharing Russia Today videos from people who created the graphic posts that got Naz Shah suspended by the Labour Party?

Why on earth are people sharing Russia Today videos from people who created the graphic posts that got Naz Shah suspended by the Labour Party?

Jeremy Wilsons Tweets: Matt Crocker will return to Southampton as new director of football operations, replacing Ross Wilson. Crocker has been at FA since 2013 where he was a contender last year to become technical director. Previously academy manager at Southampton. Announcement later today Some added detail on Matt Crocker - same title as Ross Wilson but plan is for him to have a role more similar to that of Les Reed previously whereby he oversees broader strategy through the age groups. Southampton still looking to appoint someone else specialising in recruitment

Kitzbichler was appointed as opposition analyst / first team assistant coach. Which replaces Rohls position.

because if you want to cause bad feeling you do something without everybody involved, and you are less productive if you are introducing a new training team multiple times.

Given that the International only came back yesterday. If a new coaching team had been constructed they would have only been introduced to it yesterday. and then its reasonable to assume that the earliest any announcement can be made for it is today,

Agree wholeheartedly. The problem with the transfer window (since exacerbated from the window shutting before the season starts) is that the only changeable part of the team is the manager. A slew of problems from getting players on overlong contacts to selling people like Targett is the issue. Not hassenhuttl.

We played a lb at lb every match last season too.

No, as Hassenhuttl was Successful before he Rohl was promoted to his assistant from analyst at Red Bull.

It's not a blip. The biggest muck up of the summer was selling Targett. But we've got a situation, which i don't think is improved by changing managerial personnel. We would still have a back line that can't defend.

We have two choices. Keep a manager who knows the players, understands the issues and hopefully buy a rb and a lb in january. Or Get in a manager who doesn't know the players doesn't understand the issues and finds out that he's helpless in March. I would rather stick with Hassenhuttl.

I fail to see what we can do without a LB / LWB, RB / RWB who can play the way the management team want. and for that reason we're fooked until January.

I prefer their Warning from 1992, thats their best work. https://www.ucsusa.org/resources/1992-world-scientists-warning-humanity

I'm taking it people have forgotten Bednareks disastrous start for us when he first joined?

Previous successes? Rohl was at Leibzig when Ralph joined. They were nowhere else together.

Which is why stuff like hydroponics and vertical farming is the new thing. We haven't seen any change in practices or changes in growing areas, which you'd think we would be the first to see. The big concern in our industry isn't the climate, it's Banana Blight in Cavendish banana

Personally, I'm still waiting for East Anglia to be underwater as they were telling us on the news in the early 90's. They told us that would happen by 2010. They were exaggerating then, and they're exaggerating now.

Fished in hook line and sinker. The Stinky Rebels insist we must reduce carbon without using technology or private companies. They are a doomsday sect derived from anti capitalism and extreme environmentalism. Yet they protest after their morning coffee in pret or by chugging a boat down the Thames. They're a bunch of idiots.