Nolan

http://www.skysports.com/football/news/12691/11407972/southampton-and-leicester-agree-james-maddison-fee-with-norwich "One source has told Sky Sports News that Maddison prefers Southampton but he is still to decide which club he will join."

I think its whois Financials you believe. Those who have been wrong in every other step in the last three years who don't believe the "Brexit dividend" will come in. Or those that believe that if you don't give money to the EU you have that money to spend. Soubry and Grieve are lawyers, and set certainly haven't got anything right so far when it comes to how the economy would come to pass after the vote.

Should say Arch Remainer Sarah Woolaston of the Soubry / Grieve clique.

Or maybe Les doesn't have the Same power as he used to now the clubs directorship is more than just him, and there are more directors accountable.

Well if it's the choice between Southampton and Leicester, what can Harry Reed tell Maddison about Puel?

Same agents as Yoshida according to Transfermarkt...

Something based on the 1976 kit?

Now, looking in retrospect. We March on, on the collar No discernable price tag. No discernable security tag. Have we be sold up the swanny here?

Like I said earlier. He has been given the number 5 shirt. That speaks for itself.

In the Era of plain backs its pretty much impossible to make Stripes look good. Such a backwards step from this years effort.

If we are going to continue playing a back 3, we need 5 players suited to that position. If we're going to mainly play with 2 cb's we need 4.

Possibly, but they may schedule holidays around the windows, or paper work may be simpler during the window. Guessing of course. But if they had to jump through extra hoops why not stumpy wait until the windows open. Of course, it may be the case that the change in manager means a change in target.

Russian Transfer window open on June 11th.

Handed the number 5 jersey. Fair play to the lad.

If there is one thing that would lead to long drawn out negotiations for players. It's other clubs / agents thinking we have a bottomless pot of money.

It's how the EU behave with the rest of the world currently. EU protectionism at all cost.

If that one comes to pass then or standard policy on players is well and truly dropped. We buy strikers at 25 or 26. Not 29.

Being at Norwich has given Reed the added flexibility of playing RB, RM, CM or DM. His time there could potentially benefit us. At least we may have cover for RB now.

We thought we had enough with Austin, Gabbi and Long and thought Gallaghers development would be best served with game time in the Championship, rather than not getting into a match day squad. That's perfectly reasonable, especially when you're only planning to have one front man on the pitch. Hopefully with Hughes we will use formations with more forwards on the pitch at once, but being 4th choice for one place in Pellegrinos formation is crazy.

Gallagher Didnt have a recall clause, so that's irrelevant.

I'm sure coaches / managers are aware of the quality of our younger teams from training / u23 games. Enough have been broadcast on YouTube for us to realize we don't have players coming through at the moment.

Apparently West Ham laid on private jets to get the MP paper work sorted. So it's not BS. It's just our directors are a lot more comfortable than the Hammers directors.

Officially

Does it really matter? If you want examples of joint ownership look at Watford or the Red bull franchises.

Have you serious not noticed the amount of Chelsea players going to vitesse?