Jump to content

Ivan Katalinic's 'tache

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    5,133
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Ivan Katalinic's 'tache

  1. Now that would be news. A footballer who took time out to learn to speak to deaf people.
  2. So Saints are to sign Ted Danson? He fulfills the criteria of combining "Dan" with "son" at the end of a surname, which is currently so popular with Pards (Dickson, Richardson &, maybe, Tyson).
  3. Sky's transfer centre is speculating that two of the three players leaving Ipswich are Jon Stead (to Bristol C.) and Alex Bruce (to Sheff Utd), which would then leave either Garvan or Priskin as the other.
  4. I'm sure I read somewhere that Garvan was a target for Palace for £200k, last week. Might have been the Mirror, so take with a pinch of salt!
  5. Aah, that old "minor injury, left out of the squad" thing having been linked with a move away?!
  6. http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12875_6275719,00.html Looks like Huddersfield have missed out then...
  7. Nathan Tyson will be signed and the headline will be "Tyson to give Saints more bite"
  8. So, for clarity, do you want us to sign him or not?!
  9. Forgetting our level, are they as rich as us?
  10. Although Tyson does fit the bill for both additional striker and pacy winger as he can play both roles. Slap another £100k on top Markus, and they'll probably do business!
  11. Where did you hear/see that? It makes sense, particularly as AP has said wide areas are a concern. I think Charlton have plumped for another left winger, Kyel Reid, instead because he was on loan there last year and then was released by Sheff Utd. Maybe we should go for a 6 month deal and see if he can cut over a reasonable period?
  12. I agree. I think we need to look at players like Varney who will be itching for a chance somewhere, to get away from where they're not getting a chance now, or an up and coming young Prem targetman on loan. Surely Man U have someone who fits the bill? Plymouth took a chance on Ebanks-Blake and he did alright for them and Wolves.
  13. When do we have to submit our shirt numbers for the new season by?
  14. http://www.skysports.com/story/0,19528,12876_6271300,00.html Charlton and Huddersfield are after David Mooney, who's been told he'll not be featuring in the Reading first team. Would be a useful addition as the additional striker we need, IMO, if we were after him too. Nothing to suggest we are after him, just a thought.
  15. Wasn't it Feeney who signed for Oldham?
  16. My little boy is called Matthew. Can't think of where I'd heard the name before but it seemed a nice enough choice.
  17. It also shows that some rumours on 606 come true! Didn't someone post that someone on the Palace 606 forum said he was on a flight for Zurich? How prophetic!
  18. Excellent signing. Versatility will be a big bonus. Does this mean Richardson is knackered for the start of the new season then? And why are we persisting with the releasing of news after the cut off time for stories to appear in the printed Echo...?
  19. Football Rumours is linking us with ex-Wycombe no 1 Scott Shearer on a year long deal. Would be reasonable back-up IMO.
  20. Would this be Danns and Tyson? Or are you just speculating?!
  21. 16 Jul 2010 09:22:16 Snippet from Football Rumours site which could mean our GK cover issues are about to be resolved (IF true).
  22. Spotted this in a piece about recent triallist Harlee Dean on Football Rumours site. If true, suggests no more Bart but would offer reasonable back-up to KD.
  23. Like most, I'm frustrated we've not brought in more, I must say. However, I'm hopeful things might pick up when the lads return from Switzerland, as I'm hoping AP is using the trip as a means to see who (of the fringe players) is going to play a proper part for us this season and where we need to supplement if not. For instance, if Lee Holmes is fit and in decent form, would that mean we'd look to replace only 1 of Papa or Antonio rather than both?
  24. Please Mr Allen - save us from the multi-billionaire who owns our club now...!
  25. I guess that's a no then!!
×
×
  • Create New...