Weston Super Saint

It could mean a number of things. I doubt we'll ever learn the truth though It's all about the open and transparent policy the club has

He was representing the 30 pieces of silver. In hindsight he might have been better off buying some silver papered chocolate coins rather than using real ones, but the sentiment would still have been the same. He has shown himself to be a complete numpty many times in the past, but to be fair this time he has a valid point!!

Lol. You're one of the first people to start moaning when the fans 'pick on' the team. Moan if they do pick on the team moan if they don't

It's on the other thread, but I thought it deserved it's own discussion.... A simple question really, but I expect the answer to be anything but simple Since RL and MW's return in May this year, has the overall debt of the club decreased or increased? Now I'm not talking about individual salaries cut etc etc, but has the debt - what we owe to others - reduced or grown??

I think you're right, but how much has also been added due to loans etc, and how much has been lost per week in revenue?

"There are lies, damn lies and statistics"....

So. Since Lowe came back in May, has our overall debt reduced in size or increased in size? Just curious that's all.

No chance!

Playing 1 up front at home and away IS NOT the problem Enjoy your turkey

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/3999121.Coma_girl_Sophie_will_be_home_for_Christmas/

I can't believe w e e k has been caught by the swear filter

Yeah!!!!!11111one We managed to convince Scott he really was a gheyer

And still can't f*cking spell!!!!

Are you saying this isn't the Eastenders forum?

Unlike spending £30k to put the team in an hotel before the game against Palace, and flying all de bhoysh over to Dublin for their Xmas party. Financially prudent those ideas

One good thing will come out of all this; Lowe WILL unite the majority of the fans of SFC. Unfortunately for him, they will be united AGAINST him

Don't you dare!!! We've already got enough serious people on this bored!!

Fixed it for you!!

I wouldn't worry too much, no-one will be any the wiser once he's given his answers

Not until January now eh? Even you guys must be getting bored of these substance less rumours from 'reliable sources' I wouldn't take Adams leaving as a sign of investment coming if I were you, his cards are pretty much marked at the moment aren't they? It's a shame that Gaydamak went with him in the first place as he is very much the 'cheap' option, I'd expect nothing less from us, but surely Gaydamak hasn't been getting advice from Rupert has he? I look forward to administration in January, IF it gets rid of Rupert and the other numpties in charge of our club

The biggest difference is now that punch in the head is licensed and endorsed

Unfortunately RobskII is a full member. Baj could have retired by February otherwise

It must be a first, but I find my self agreeing with Wiltshire :shock:

Working in a pub that used to have lots of younger people in it, I would agree that it is probably about 80-90%. However I would have said the age bracket is about 17-25 rather than 21-39 mainly because people of my age [35] would not have had such a prevalence of the drug when we were out 'clubbing'. I think it's probably on a par with 'E's' from the 80's where I was probably in the 10% that could never be bothered to try them....

It'd be fun! We'd need a lock in though as we'd never agree