Farmer Saint

I don't think so - it's why posters are allowed to be stalked on the forum for having the gall to suggest that maybe the club has a strategy that spreads the risk and allows relegation in a sustainable way.

25 of 27

24 of 26. Try spending some time with your family - kids don't like absent Dad's, especially when all they're doing is following someone on an online forum.

23 of 25 now Weston.

Free hit here - a whole team missing so not much we can do about this game. We'll get pumped and that's fine.

He said it, not me.

I'm relatively new to forum's - I just can't believe how toxic some people are. I can imagine these people do it to take out their life's frustrations on those on t'internet. You can see how some people grow to think they police the forum as they are allowed to use stalking tactics and intimidation that would be illegal in real life.

Yes, yes I do, as ever since that discussion he has followed me around the forum - literally stalking me.

21 of 23 posts now Weston...

Just read the Israel thread...Gazan women and children (5-9 year olds are the largest group of dead in Gaza) are expendable because they are Muslim apparently. It's the reason he's on ignore as I don't think anyone needs to see that kind of person's comments.

19 of his past 21 posts have been about me. Mental that he has that kind of time available inbetween his furious masturbating over dead Muslim children.

Shit everyone, keep your heads down - the forum vigilante has arrived 🤣

Not sure about that - we have as many points as we have, but it is frustrating. Probably should have 10 points. However, I also think we'd have got 3 points against Leicester as we'd have likely been 3-1 up with 20 to play. Wolves was 3 mistakes, which is a bit insane, but not sure if we'd have got anything from it anyway.

He's looked crap every time I've watched him - get rid (and Cornet).

300 killed, including 20 civilians. I bet Israel wished they could have ratios like that.

19 of 21.

It's the misplaced arrogance of it all. "One of my fundamental roles on this forum...". Fucking hell - what type of tosser actually talks like that without realising he's some sad fuck keyboard warrior. As if he's providing a service to the other members 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Yup, agree.

Ooh, one of the hyena's has shown up. Let me guess, posting about me again? What is that, 18 of your last 20 posts about me? Utterly obsessed.

But you think my theory about yo-yo club is correct, don't you? Self-styled forum enforcer though 🤣🤣🤣

None were as good as Archers in the first half though. They had a number of half chances, but that was it. I'd have expected them to be a couple up, maybe 2-1 or 3-1 at half time.

He speaks out both sides of his mouth too often, that's his issue. Spent the last 6 months saying we're not planning to be a yo-yo club, then describes a yo-yo club strategy as what we're doing. Never offers his own ideas, just criticises others for having opinions as his hyenas follow him, eating the shit that falls out of both sides of his mouth. Hope you're well Nick 👍

TBF Brighton had an expected goals of 1.67 for the whole game, so not sure we should have been 5 down is quite right. We could have been, but that would have been quite an anomaly.

I also thought when we sacked Ralph we couldn't do any worse. Was massively wrong then.

So, you don't know anything about Potter's football style then - it's very similar to Russ's, possession based and maybe even slightly more defensive. His team's don't score many goals, but tend to defend quite well. The football is not exciting. By the time he left the Brighton fans were soooo happy he was out. No idea why he is rated as highly as he is tbh. Just found this nugget online about him as well - remind you of anyone: "Player selection Potter prefers players who are brave, enjoy football, and aren't afraid to make mistakes." Good article on him below, and his time at Brighton: https://analyticsfc.co.uk/blog/2022/09/20/data-in-context-how-did-graham-potters-brighton-achieve-a-big-six-style-of-play-with-a-bottom-six-budget/ "The first and clearest difference that can be seen in Brighton’s first two PL season’s under Hughton, compared to the subsequent seasons under Potter, is their directness, featured on the bottom axis in green, measured by their total passes per sequence (PPS – a sequence defined as events from gain of possession until loss of possession, stoppage in play, or a shot). On this axis there is a very clear difference between Hughton’s very direct Brighton and Potter’s. Brighton’s early sides appear alongside the likes of Burnley, Everton, Newcastle, and Watford, all sides that looked for fast attacking transitions to exploit space behind an opposition when gaining possession in the 2021/22 season. After their managerial change Brighton transitioned incredibly quickly to their new style, becoming far more patient and less direct. In their first season under the new manager, The Seagulls put together 11.9 passes per sequence, the third highest in the dataset after possession-heavy sides Manchester City and Liverpool. "