-
Posts
8,303 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Pancake
-
By Stevo... pinch (handful) of salt?
-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G9mtz6HKJHY&feature=channel[b http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WrrvkPo7TZ4&feature=channel http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Esr_okP5Qmo&feature=channel
-
M Jackson!
-
Pinnacle plans conditional on promotion in first season
Pancake replied to modern matron's topic in The Saints
TBF, I thought the article made sense. if you are Mr X and want to get some return on your money quickly in the fickle world for football, you want to get the team up to the Premiership as quickly as possible, and back to the CCC level as soon as. 2 years in League One is not a financially viable option for someone that wants to make money; and lets face it, we are not being purchased by someone who is doing it for the love of teh club, they are buying as for the potential to make money. -
There you go.
-
Listen to the Sage advice on here and you wont get Stuffed.
-
Doesn't really work does it. You were out on a limb there...
-
mclusky - mclusky Do Dallas.
-
He might be out chasing lizard men...
-
-
Yes it does. Im a bad person
-
Derby was prior to the penalty points rule coming in and West Ham are looked after by the PL not the FL.
-
Im pretty sure that the "Golden Share" in held by the SFC Board rather than by the SLH Board.
-
Really? God, one of the least funny "funny people" I have ever had the displeasure to watch on TV.
-
Sorry, my understanding is that at present SFC are in the Football League, and are currently at -10 points in League One. As long as SLH does not go into liquidation, SFC will start the League season in League One and can continue all season if needs be. if SLH go into liquidation before the "asset" of SFC is sold, the they (the club) cease to exist and drop out of the FL structure.
-
...SFC for £x ...SMS for £y ...Stapelwood for £z ...Jacksons Farm for £n ...Others fior £m what will happen to SLH? No one will have bought them, and the money raised from selling the bits n bobs will go to satisfying the creditors. Will SLH just fold and die? If that is the case, if Pinnacle pick up SFC, SMS and Staplewood; will Fry et al stay on as Administrators of SLH to sell Jacksons Farm and other bits?
-
Song may or may not be, but the titles cause a tittle.
-
Totally agree about GM...
-
Apart from GM, I cant see anyone "hating" Pinnacle. A few are getting fed up with the delays (with reason IMHO), but I cant see a groundswell of anti-Pinnacle postings on here.
-
I dont feel that Pinnacle stand much of a chance of getting it sorted either; but I dont know all the fact, I haven't read all the legal docs, the ins and outs, the clauses and caveats, the confidential notes, and signed contracts.
-
Interesting concept, but surely SFC are still a Football League club; after all, even if the "takeover" doesnt happen we could, in theory still play our fixtures this season whislt in Administration - a la Bournemouth (IIRC)
-
Shocker. FOTA realise that they wouldn't get the same level of exposure (A1GP anyone?) and FIA realise that they need some big name.
-
Sometimes I really do wonder if some pf the posters on here actually support SFC at all. The points deduction may or may not be fair; that I don't know about as I am not clued up on the whole ins and outs. But what I am sure of is that I personally fell that the FL asking us to sign away our right to appeal against the points deduction is out of order. IF Pinnacle feel that THEY have sufficient evidence to argue their case, why not let them? It isn't about if the points deduction is correct or not, as so far we have only heard the official FL view on this (that the points are fair). What we haven't heard officially are teh reasons that Pinnacle believe that the points are unfair. Without the "right to appeal" we will, probably, never hear this and therefore will not be able to make full judgement. So, I ask you Fry and Engine; why do you feel that SFC should have their right to appeal taken away? Im not talking about IF the point deduction is fair or not, Im talking about the fairness of taking away the right to appeal.
