Saint_clark

Why would it be too much hassle? It works fine on footballforums with far more members. It'd take about 60 seconds to type out the username, the infractions given and the reason why.

Doesn't matter what division we're in tbh, i'd still be going. The people who kept going in our CCC relegation season have sat through the worst we'll ever see for our team, i'm 99.99% sure of that.

How does this work then, because Hudders and Posh are well above both Walsall and Yeovil, and we beat them both 4-1. Surely this is a paradox and the world should have imploded?

The "member departures thread" could just be typed out manually, no need to over complicate it really.

Butterfield also hoofs as well, but let's not let that get in the way.

I was talking about the other replies that I deleted.

All well and good, but Cortese has already said that should the Liebherrs pull out he's had other people approach him wanting to be part of the set up who can put funds in.

I agree...he does actually make me laugh and it's blatantly obvious that half of what he posts is not serious. The real problem is the people who can't use common sense and tell the difference between having a bit of a laugh and being a c*nt, and then report every tiny little thing.

Adrian, if we were as "power hungry" and strict as you like to think, Deppo would have been perma-banned a long, long time ago.

I suggested a "member departures" thread a while ago. An example of where this works can be found here; http://www.footballforums.net/forums/showthread.php/144876-Member-Departures But tbh it's up the two admins if they want something like that to go ahead. I think it'd work brilliantly here.

No need to be such c*cks about it guys, it's a valid question.

No. How about people just try to respect everyones opinions, as per the rules.

Well this obviously isn't getting anywhere. If you want to renew, then do so, if you don't then don't. Nothing we can do to make your mind up for you.

Hmm true I suppose - but then if, for example, Butterfield has a blinder, sets up a goal and nothing gets past him, but then Richardson does twice as well in training that week, who should get the next starting slot? Surely whichever you choose the other is going to be completely demoralised.

Really? Not sure I believe that, the ticket office have been wrong before...probably 8,000 tickets left before the itchen north opens, which would leave around 11,000 left altogether.

Training and matches are two different things - as long as Butterfield stays solid there is no real reason for Adkins to risk putting Richardson in just because he looks better in training.

Well Richardson was in the team of the year last season, and we've only seen him so far when recovering from a nasty injury. As I said, when he gets a run in the team like Butterfield has, I think he'll show to be much better. Unfortunately it could work out that Butterfield stays solid till the end of the season and Richardson ends up asking to leave, and we'll never get a chance to find out.

I've got a horrible feeling it'll be under 20k...

I defended my opinion, much in the same way you do.

It's a nice feeling, picturing that happening

When Cortese speaks about the 5 year plan he is talking about the whole club, including the Saints foundation, the training ground and redevelopment of the stadium. He won't walk away just because one aspect of the plan is a little bit harder to achieve.

Richardson hasn't had a run in the team like Butterfield has, and I think if he got it we would see he is much better. That's not to say that Butterfield hasn't been very solid though.

They're expected to win, so if you're prediction comes true then they clear are "doing" expectation.

I f*cking hate that c*nting Nani. That injury wasn't serious, he ran over to complain to the ref and then fell over again clutching his face...then was stretchered off holding his leg.

It's a science fiction film...if you accept the premise that it's possible to clone dinosaurs from DNA, it's pretty much a given they can increase their growth rate.