buctootim

That wouldnt explain the lack of tactical nous or game plan. Koeman also said we tried to press the whole game, which was impossible, and weren't smart in pressing at the right time. That endless running for 70 minutes, get knackered and then concede was an unmistakeable trademark of Pochettino's team.

Mainboard

The link Redslo posted up is interesting. We have one of the best conversion rates of chances into goals going -up there with (almost) the very best. If Pelle is getting stick its because some fans expectations are ridiculous, not because he's failing.

We have gradually built up strength in depth across the whole field, except goalkeeper. It such a glaring weakness. It only makes sense if we have a recall option on Boruc.

velvet

dance

Adkins would be a good choice for them.

Coxford

Did he not pay his £5 then?

http://www.cartakeback.com/

Jeez talk about heavy airbrushing. They must've used a couple of gallons of Dulux.

Sorry bit lazy I know. I haven't noticed him being annoying so wasn't sure why he was getting stick. Hes obviously young though - we were all irritating cocks some of the time then.

Resentful that he goes to Saints whilst you're stuck commuting to a dull job in an off the peg suit of your own huh

When was Villa Boas was sacked Spurs were 7th with 1.83 points per game , when Tim Sherwood was sacked they finished 6th with 1.82 ppg. Under Pochettino they are currently 6th with 1.74 points per game. Would be awful if something happened to him.

Unwashed?

NHS reorganisation was disastrous, says King's Fund. The King's Fund is a hugely respected policy body which looks only at healthcare. If it says something about healthcare you can pretty much take it to the bank. According to them the first two years of the coalition were disastrous for the health service and a hugely complex bureaucracy was introduced. The past two years have been better with increased focus on patient care. Labour is crying wolf over more privatisation. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-31145600

Good job you and I don't live there then

Same old sad Pap. Big alarmist statement followed by climbdown when faced with facts. Southampton is bang in the middle of the rates for similar places. Not high not low. Sorry if that ****es on your latest bonfire.

No. 20 offences per 100,000 population is bang in the middle of the comparable range on a par with Bristol, Leicester and Manchester, lower than Norwich, Hastings and Blackpool. Lame effort. http://www.police.uk/greater-manchester/A1/performance/compare-your-area/violent-crime/#msg_comparison

Same old same old. As always you are making up stuff about peoples motivations and goals when you have no idea; have not spoken to them and have no factual basis for your claims. It all just comes from your rather confused and inconsistent mind, and when asked to justify them you get aggressive and abusive.

So what? The trouble with most of your theories is that you think that proof someone is holding an apple is also proof that they must be hiding an orange. Making leaps from one thought to another and trying to link them by use of non sequiturs is why you get stick.

My point was that you are falling into the trap of extrapolating your own experience to everyone else. Verbal said it more eloquently than me.

More made up stuff courtesy of the fantasy that happens in Pap's mind. Go Pap, spearhead the revolution that only you are smart enough to plan.

You've watched Benefits Street, I haven't. You know who Josie Cunningham is, I don't. If there is an obsession (and media hype about them isn't matched by viewing figures) its with you. You've just admitted your politics have changed radically - so lets not point the finger at everybody else eh?