buctootim

Theres that lack of clarity of thought again. 'He has the power to create money from nothing, therefore it must be his money, therefore he must be vastly wealthy'. Those logic gaps is what makes your theories and views so risible. Carney is a government employee on flat rate salary - a very good and high salary compared to most of us but a salary which is a fraction of what he could earn in the private investment banks. Living in a house commensurate with your public position is normal. Living at No10 Downing Street didnt mean John Major or Gordon Brown were rich. Its not tricky stuff.

So you made a statement with no foundation to it. Thats the point. Most of your stuff is just, like Benji said, like the product of a six former, either made up or plain wrong. I dont know Mark Carney, I've simply met his wife a couple of times. The Government had to agree to rent him a house in London otherwise he couldn't afford to take the job, given London house prices.

Very nice. So back to the question and your line "vastly wealthy central bankers that tried to enslave nations over the pretend money it issued". Who are they and how much money do they have? Surely you can answer that given you made the claim so boldly?

Go on then. List the top 10 "vastly wealthy central bankers that tried to enslave nations over the pretend money it issued". I'll give you a little pointer. Ive been to Mark Carney's house. He aint rich.

Stick to coding Pap. Once things get wider than you and your house things get a little hazy for you.

Yeah but are they happy? They only got paid in pretend money dontchaknow?

Cardiff

Its nonsense. The crisis didn't start in 2010, its started decades before with successive governments promising ever more spending and not collecting the tax to pay for it. 2010 was simply when the smack drip got cut off and the bailiffs turned up.

Bit of a non sequiteur isn't it?

Sounds like the costs will eat up the savings. My boiler has a simple thermostat located outside the house in addition to the room controller. It knows when its relatively mild outside its doesnt have to heat the radiator water to such a high temperature to maintain the temperature inside the house set by the room thermostat. Boilers are more energy efficient operating at lower temperatures so that saves money. Of course when its really cold outside it whacks up the radiator temperature to maintain the correct temperature inside. It saves money for sure, but Ive no idea how much. Edit, its this. This one only works with Vaillant boilers, maybe there is something similar for yours. It adds 3% to the efficency of the boiler. http://www.vaillant.co.uk/products/domestic-boilers/controls/vrc-470/

Humber

Do you mean 38.9% or 18.9%? (genuine question)

Page three is an anachronism from a different age. Attitudes have changed and it should go. If I'm sat in a waiting room somewhere and the sun is the only paper I always skip past page 3 so I never see the news on page 2. That said I think its importance is overstated. Its not w**k material for men, its much more casual than that, more like checking someone out on the street. Also the Sun isn't seen as a style leader or influential by young people. The incessant ads and lifestyle mags which tell teenagers how to act, eat, think and dress are far more damaging.

I used to have genuine incomprehension how anyone could like her singing, too many wobbly lips and melodies for my taste - but there were some very good songs on her 'Performance album a few years ago, including this:

There is a large cross on in a hillside near Benidorm where my kids are convinced Elvis is buried. Ive no idea why.

laundry

Its not everyday you hear about a new fetish you's spent your whole life in ignorance of .

whiffy

Canada Increase in homicides committed with a firearm in 2012 Shootings (33% of all homicides) and stabbings (31%) remained the most common methods of committing homicide in 2012, according to national homicide information that includes the province of Quebec. The rate of firearm-related homicide was 0.49 per 100,000 population in 2012, up 8% from the previous year. Despite the increase, Canada's firearm-related homicide rate in 2012 was 61% lower than in 1975, when the rate of firearm homicide was at its peak. There were 172 firearm-related homicides in Canada in 2012, a rise of 14 over the previous year. In contrast, there were 40 fewer stabbings, 13 fewer beatings, and 16 fewer homicides committed with other methods in Canada in 2012. Canada's firearm-related homicide rate in 2012 was about seven times lower than that of the United States (3.5 per 100,000 population in 2012) and was similar to rates in Ireland (0.36 per 100,000 population in 2010) and Switzerland (0.52 per 100,000 population in 2010). The Canadian rate was considerably higher than the rates in Japan (0.01 per 100,000 population in 2008) and the United Kingdom (0.06 per 100,000 population in 2011). In 2012, about half (46%) of all homicides committed with a firearm were gang-related, compared with fewer than 1 in 10 homicides committed with another type of weapon or with physical force. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/140423/dq140423b-eng.htm

Tesco

Im pretty sure thats why he's getting odds of 1,800:1 as opposed to evens.

Desperate

Guns are very attractive and the bigger bang the gun makes the more attractive it is. Who would refuse the chance to fire a tank at a target scrap car? If you gave chimps guns there would be more dead chimps. Things which are both attractive and deadly is not a good combination. That's why access to them should be restricted.