buctootim

Cameron and Osbourne / Milliband and Balls have got to be the weakest party leadership teams in living memory.

My judgement is that you are a tiresome **** pap. You confessed here on this forum to hitting of your daughter. I did criticise you for that. If you cant tell the difference between condemning somebody for their self conefessed actions and condemning a dead man for allegations not made in his lifetime then you are much less smart, or more disigenuous than I thought. Anyway have no fear, I now have you marked as one of the posters not worth responding to.

I dont doubt you have a daughter, I remember seeing the pic. I dont doubt hypo has a girlfriend The point is that you can put a malign filter on anything. That girl in the pic was just somebody you met at a match but posted up to pretend you had a life, or maybe she was some 15 year old you were grooming. The odd thing about your posting style pap is that on the big macro issues you are very liberal but on the individual level very quick to pass judgment, based on very little. Maybe the beliefs in conspiracies follows though into assuming posters, or indeed everyone in general is trying to hide something.

Because I was staying on topic perchance? Replying to your post on the Jimmy Savile thread that was about Jimmy Savile rather than going off on a tangent in replying to Jonnyboy's post that was about somebody else - which incidentally I didnt know who he was getting at until hypo responded. Still dont let me deprive you of nursing that little grievance of yours.

Why's that pap? Is Jonnyboy more mentally agile than you? Do you think I fear his ripostes more? Or is it that you appear to have 'shout my mouth off and put people down but cry when others do it to me even jokingly syndrome'. What a shame.

I havent got the hump! Its just wannabe scouse midgets with imaginary daughters pointing the finger and swinging their dicks get on my tits.

http://www.bridgingandcommercialdistributor.co.uk/newsstory?id=306&type=news&title=well-known_packager_in_6_47m_bid_for_football_club

Watched Witchhunt yet? or 'In the Name of the Children' ? http://www.witchhuntmovie.com/exonerated.html http://www.precisionclaims.co.uk/services/abuse-claims/false-accusations Yes I've given my personal opinion on matters which are entirely down to personal opinion, issues when you've happened to have been in the minority. Thats what discussion boards are for. Bit different to condemning a man for crimes when you know none of the facts and then making personal accusations against someone who doesnt take the same easy view.

Very snidey and a bit low if I may say. I have no idea if he was guilty of the offences he is accused of or not - and neither do you. Its very easy to join lynch mobs - especially ones formed post mortem when the other side of the story cant be told. A bit pathetic to point the finger at those who refuse to join in the lynching too.

Its not that surprising. He is dead.

Maybe NA asked for him to not be called up, citing injuries to two other midfielders?

It is disconcerting, but maybe seen in the context of spending c£50m in one season (c£20m on Staplewood and £30m in the transfer market) its not too surprising if the cashflow is a bit stretched. These are multi year investments so if they are paid for over several years its not the end of the world.

You mmight want to get a plastic cover for the telly if you're going to get Joey the Orca to leap through the hoop of fire in your lounge

I agree with Norway about keeping animals which naturally live in the open in small cages or even trapped in the house like some cats are. However brain size comes into it too. So whilst keeping dolphins and killer whales in small pens and making them perform tricks is abhorrent to me, I have no problem at all with small reef fish being kept in a well maintained tank.

I never knew that.TSW is an education.

bang on the mark.

Quite. Happened to Dave Jones too. Given the sad state of our press there are powerful £ shaped reasons for making stuff up about public figures, especially dead ones.

Do you think he would complete the show if it were even slightly real?

So because hundreds of people havent reported anything, that is proof that hundreds are guilty? Way to go, wave goodbye to logic central.

Not a big reader of tabloid pap then Florida? http://www.mirror.co.uk/3am/celebrity-news/cat-deeley-marries-patrick-kielty-1353229

He was a bit weird, single and did kids programs so quite clearly a paedo. No other possible explanation. Living with his mum and doing lots of work for charity was obviously just a front. Paedophile hunters, the 21st century cris de coeur that many people seem to take an unhealthy interest in. Odd. So there is a programme outing him Wednesday? Only broadcast after his death? Surely if they thought they had credible evidence it would have been broadcast whilst he was alive? The fact that the producers didnt feel they would win a libel case where the burden of proof was simple balance of probability should tell you something.

No its not. Its a well known spoof designed to pull in a gullible journo and rehashed by gullible net surfers.

The problem is houses are way too expensive compared to incomes and are generally of poor quality. Things like private landlords / housing benefirt/ selling off council houses have exacerbated the situation but not caused it. If we are going to have consistent immigration we need to build a lot more houses. I'd argue we should build a lot of high quality spacious detached homes - hundreds of thousands - on land compulsorily purchased at agricultural land prices. It would puncture the ridiculous price premium at the top end and cause prices to fall throughout the chain whilst making better quality houses available at all levels as people trade up. .

http://news.yahoo.com/warren-buffett-secretary-talk-taxes-221442297--abc-news.html http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-14533987 Warren Buffett has called for Congress to make him and his "mega-rich friends" pay more income tax. In a piece in the New York Times newspaper, the billionaire investor and philanthropist said the rich should do more to help plug the deficit. He called for a tax rise for those earning more than $1m (£600,000), and a higher rate for those on over $10m. In a rebuttal of arguments made by Republicans, he said tax rises would not hurt investment or jobs in the US.