Gingeletiss

Prove it, don't just stir the sh1t, prove your above statement, both parts of it.

Duncan, this is just my take on things here. If what you allude to can be backed up with facts, real facts, then you have no reason to fear being shot down. So if you have something to share, then feel free, it's all the inuendo you come out with, that gets up my nose. Then of course you could be like the poster I'm just about to quote, who posts without any facts at all.....don't you Hypo.

Bl00dy hell, I get home from nights, have a kip, and wake up to yet another thread slagging off our club. I wonder where all the moderation is on here, reference trolling. It is the same old names, quick to force their opinions on the rest of us, dressed up as fact, and woe betide, anyone who dare disagree with them. Some of you are a disgrace, and if you can't find it in your hearts to actually support the club, then ferk of and support Man City or such. Maybe the club is NOT being run in the manner you wish it to be, but it is being run, and honestly at that. I laugh at that troll Alpine, decrying the Saints after loosing their first match, something which is commonplace in our history. Alps, take a rest, your continual spite, is spoiling this board for proper fans, and take those trolling apprentices Stu and Hypo with you, of, and save a place for the writer of this OP.

Not a bad article, if they had bothered to get their facts right. Remind me again, who is our owner? note what the club's owner, Nicola Cortese, said a couple of months ago:

My my, and that coming from you. I used to enjoy your posts, but of late, you have got more extreme in your condemnation of our club, to the extent, that I now wonder which south coast club you actually support!

Poor souls only took 12 men up there....please everyone, let us sign some more!!

I'm not going to look at all the replies here, as I'm sure half of them will be slagging of all and sundry, connected with the club. My point is, you should not be surprised by this result, I have followed Saints for 50 odd years, and we have a good track record of loosing the first game, and we're reknown for our slow starts. So keep the faith eh chaps, a long way to go yet.

Really!, didn't see that many at their 'legends' testimonial last week:lol:

Won't be an argument soon, as you won't be a club, not that you are now! well, not an honest one anyway. As for the argument for now, you are small of stature, small in fanbase, no ground of your own, no training facility, in fact, no anything. Since your arrival 12 years ago (PCFC), you have one the FA cup once, so have we, so how does that make you bigger. Forget what went before that, you lost that when you cheated the first time round, seems that is the only thing you are really good at. Cheats

At work,again, but will be able to hear the cheers from my office..........I hope.

You really are a bottom feeder, arn't you? Your admin team have just gone cap in hand, to yet another spineless judge, boo hooing all over the court room, about how everyone is picking on you, please feel sorry for us, we only ripped of local charities a little bit, and after all, who needs a new school, so why worry about a few million owed in tax. Then, like the slimeball you appear to be, you come on here and have your little gloat. You will disappear, because week by week,month by month, more and more pressure will be bought to bare, on your cheating slimey little excuse for football club, and when you go pop, there will be a collective sigh of relief, throughout the country.

Why are so many on here, so quick to see the negative side of this? It is standard practise in many areas outside of football, and even tha national papers buy alot of their pictures from freelancers. All NC is doing, is protecting the image rights of SFC, hey, if it's good enough for cheats fc, then it has to be good enough for us.

Well, I'm so f'd offwith all the authorities, they have allowed these bunch of c unts to flick two fingers up at everyone. I hope now, beyond all hopes, that they get promotion straight back into the PL, that will send shockwaves through the halls of those old t wats, and their inability to have acted when they should of done I will laugh my c ock off, if that were to happen. Poopey for champion, Poopey for the FA cup.bring it on.

Hate the f*cking barstewards. I guess that Hull will be much relieved tonight, they now know that administration holds no fears for them!

Un bl00dy believable:x:x

He said yesterday, between 1500 hrs and 1700 hrs.

Are you saying he doesnt have both QC's in for tea, before delivering his verdict, guess they had it wrong on John Deed:rolleyes:

I have a birdie account, just don't know how to use it:(

Never see Judge John Deed nick;)

Judge did say he would let them know, before delivering his decision in court, or did I hear that wrong yesterday?

It does when AA admitted it as part of the CVA, when the proposal was made, then omitted it, when the vote was taken.

Pre pack administration........... Following on from this pre pack insolvency procedure the administrator is obliged by law to file a report to the Secretary of State for Business Innovation and Skills (BIS) on the conduct of company directors and disclose any misconduct on their part. The reason for the company's failure must also be reported by the administrator. I trust AA has not in fact, been complicit in a prepack deal, without approval of the court.

Pre pack...... "Your Company Ltd" takes expert advice from insolvency practitioners or turnaround practitioners on its very poor financial position. It is likely the company has threats from landlords, HMRC for PAYE and VAT, the bank and many trade creditors. The directors are worried about wrongful trading and their personal risk. The business may have onerous contracts or too much property, too many employees and or lost market share/customers. This advice should be thorough and a report prepared in writing for the board and possibly for the bank. All options such as company voluntary arrangement, trade sale, refinancing, administration, creditors voluntary liquidation and pre-pack administration must be considered as part of the SIP 16 rules (see below). If there are good reasons for pre-pack this option should be very carefully considered by the board of directors. If a decision is taken to go down this path a board meeting should be held and a resolution passed stating the company's board will consider the option in greater detail. It’s likely the resolution will include the appointment of advisors either insolvency practitioners (IP), turnaround practitioners or accountants to act as advisors to the board.

Pre pack administration... Pre-Pack Administration/Liquidation A commonly used product within insolvency services is pre-packaged administration. The deal is agreed pre-appointment with an Insolvency Practitioner. This allows a new company to purchase the assets back on appointment at the discretion of the debenture holders. Benefits of a phoenix company A phoenix company arises from the ashes of another. This accomplishes the recovery of a business that has a viable core but is unable to repay outstanding debts. It is a pragmatic arrangement that protects the interests of employees and private enterprise: * Preserves jobs for Directors & employees; * Achieves a write-off of debt (not subject to debentures or Personal Guarantees); * Releases the business from leases or contracts that may no longer be required (as they remain with the old company to be dealt with by the Insolvency Practitioner subject to Personal Guarantees); * Avoids disruption to customers & other stakeholders; * Often achieves a higher return for creditors. Advantages of a pre-pack Pre-pack administration provides a planned & swift transition to a new phoenix company: * The sale of the business assets & undertaking is agreed in advance; * The business may apply to trade under a variation of the original name; * Minimum disruption occurs and it is possible that some customers may be unaware of the change.

Saved me rectifiying that point. Ashtead Saint, do you feel as I do, that this has been a pre pack administration, in all but name, and do you think that this was legal? As my limited knowledge tells me that it wasn't.