If Lowe's happy with the way he handled things, and from what you say Weston, it's sounding like he didn't have a lot of choices and his hands were largely tied by the bank etc, then wouldn't it make sense for him to formally give his side of the story in an interview some time soon?
Otherwise some people will continue to believe that he had some kind of vindictive hand in bringing the club to its knees.
Or perhaps he feels that people simply wouldn't believe him so he's thinking "what's the point"?
I agree that this is water under the bridge, but there again, all human history is. If we never tried to understand the past then the future wouldn't be as rosey....