Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    56,506
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trousers

  1. If it's as 'dramatic' as that why are we not seeing more daily coverage in the national press?
  2. "Further contact has been made with the League in the last half hour" Sorry, but that sounds too 'casual' for my liking. As per my questions earlier about how much 'time-of-day' the Football League are giving to this, I rather suspect Pinnacle have not been in a locked room all day with the Football League, much like the RMT and London Underground would be in an 11th hour dispute situation, rather they are having to 'pester' the Football League to divert some of their time scheduled on other matters to deal with the Saints issue(s). All supposition on my part but that's the impression I get.
  3. Is he counting staff pay in that total?
  4. Who's Spencer?
  5. Do you think he'll explain his coded message about the players wanting eggs for breakfast?
  6. Ah...good spot....I do believe that's the sound of Professor Freud slipping over
  7. Why do I just know that the most important news to ever affect this club will come out the minute I head home for work this evening....
  8. Here's hoping that's not a rhetorical question...
  9. Cheers Farmer....any time in the next 30 minutes would be handy - thanks
  10. If people didn't keep pointing out people posting unnecessary comments then we wouldn't have to keep on reading them
  11. Queen Elizabeth
  12. Imudia was released by the club on 6th May 2009.... Anyway, less football talk...back to interviews with prospective new owners driving tractors....
  13. Imudia was a Hockaday 'discovery'...maybe Hockaday is back at the club in some capacity and recalled him from wherever he ended up?
  14. Might be a conflict of interests if Barclays ran a football club given their association with English football (although not directly the Football League, granted). Makes sense in principle though.
  15. Any connection....? Would make a great visitor attraction as part of a new dock side esplanade next to SMS....IMHO http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/news/4453206.QE2_may_be_coming_back_to_Southampton/ Dubai based QE2 may return to Southampton 5:20pm Tuesday 23rd June 2009 Comments (30) Have your say » Exclusive By Gareth Lewis » MYSTERY surrounds an approach for legendary Southampton liner Queen Elizabeth 2 to make a stunning return to her home city. The Daily Echo has learned from high-placed sources that port bosses have been contacted about the possibility of an astonishing comeback by the Grand Old Lady of the Sea towards the end of the year. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nakheel Nakheel (Arabic: نخيل‎ palms or palm trees) is a real estate developer in Dubai and creator of several land reclamation projects, including the Palm Islands, the Dubai Waterfront, The World and The Universe Islands.
  16. Fair point...! Is this the chap...?
  17. Beckham
  18. That was a strange thing for him to say unprompted IMHO....perhaps there's a hidden message he was trying to convey.....well worth a conspiracy theory or two.... Perhaps our mystery money man is big in chickens....?
  19. So, in theory, when Pinnacle submitted their overnight response on the latest FL position back to the FL earlier today, the FL will have replied either: (a) "Thanks for your reply. We will have someone available to look at this next Tuesday. We will keep you posted" or (b) "Thanks for your reply. Our top man was expecting it and is looking through it now and we'll get back to you by 5pm with a decision one way or the other" ?
  20. So, it would be MLT as chairman and Crouch as 'President'...perhaps?
  21. Such a picture did the rounds last time so there's one out there somewhere
  22. No, it was reported that way...on the formal Stock Exchange announcment at the time....it stated categorically that the SLH board appointed the administrators. Yes, Barclays withdrew their support but the actual act of going into administration was an action taken by the SLH board.
  23. Indeed. If, as some are saying, that technically the Football League does not recognise the existence of the current PRE-TAKEOVER 'version' of Southampton Football Club then why have they included SFC in their starting league tables and fixture list for next year? Why does a change of ownership affect the status of the club in the eyes of the Football League?
  24. Apologies for the 'bump' but does anyone have an inkling or insight into the frequency and duration of Pinnacle's meetings with the Football League? I'm not after exact times and places just whether we've got the services of a dedicated FL 'team' or whether they are having to squeeze in chats into the already busy schedules of the FL reps dealing with our case. Thanks
×
×
  • Create New...