trousers

It doesn't mean anything. Just an observation.

'Z' is for thinking we're at the end only to find there's been lots of letters missed along the way

'P' is for things always happening in the wrong order

I can confirm that the number of people who have been a member of this forum for over two years, but have less than 50 posts, and have posted this evening is 23. Thank you

Indeed....we must be reaching a juncture now whereby every day 'lost' trying to protect the right to appeal against the -10 point penalty is translating into projected points lost on the field at the start of the season due to poor pre-season preparation. If the 'fight' against the FL was ONLY about the -10 points then it's fast becoming a false economy...

It's not Bernie Clifton. FACT

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=12705

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/4328611.First_look_at_Saints__potential_new_owners_at_St_Mary_s/

More new posters on here this evening than a new poster convention

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?t=14041

More or less the same statement as Tony's post on here in the wee hours of this morning?

Yeah, penny's dropped now....That'll learn me to read too sentences as two completely separate entities rather than as a good old fashioned paragraph.

That switch broke a long time ago...!

Ah...so Farmer meant that "the bullish Irish fella" at training today was infact Tony Lynam. That's me officially losing the plot then...

Tom Anderson? http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/markets/article.html?in_article_id=430388&in_page_id=3

Timings please

Didn't The Farmer mention an Irish presence at the training ground today too....? 2 + 2 anyone?

At some point in time, one would deduce from their post in May....

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?p=313847#post313847 ?

...

Don't we all?

I'm thinking similar thought but perhaps an alternative mutually acceptable 'way out' would be for 'SFC Ltd' to actually go into administration, albeit very temporarily so that it triggers an arbitrary/token CVA process, on condition that the FL will guarantee that all we lose is 10 points....dunno TBH

Perhaps....just perhaps....Pinnacle have come to an arrangement with the Football League whereby the FL agree to restrict the points penalty to -10 as long as SFC go through the CVA process. But, of course, to do that SFC itself would have to go into administration....and perhaps (that's a big "perhaps")....'engineering' a missed pay day will force SFC into a technical administration, so that they can bounce straight back out of it with the requisit CVA....and, hey presto, the FL are happy and SFC are (relatively) happy because we've avoided something worse than a -10 point penalty. Could that be what it's all about? i.e. it's not just about the -10 points, it's about going through the due process to avoid further points penalties and/or demotions??????? No idea...I'm making this up as I go along (first time for everything....)

A bold prediction IMHO