Jump to content

trousers

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    55,663
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by trousers

  1. Perhaps Jan wanted to go but couldn't afford to resign and Crouch stepped in to help him out? Perhaps?
  2. Git. I've got to change my avatar now. Thanks.
  3. What changed between the meeting with Poortvliet earlier in the week and now?
  4. What part did kim van de waals have to play in this decision...?
  5. Portvliet out. Wotte in. As predicted two days ago. No surprise.
  6. Of course he does. Rules is rules.
  7. Book of Private School Euphemisms Volume 2, chapter 8 ?
  8. Which begs the question...why haven;t the Echo (or anyone else from the media or public at large) questioned this with the club? Seems a bit fundamental to the success of the club if you ask me and yet only a few people on here seem to have recognised as such. Doesn't add up....
  9. So...another thread that drifts to no conclusion. Great.
  10. Venn diagram anyone?
  11. So...another week that promised "significant events" peters out.....surprise surprise...
  12. I suspect it would have given Lowe more pleasure to have 'won' by a much smaller margin with those present voting that it did to win by a landslide due to the large number of abstaintees.
  13. Done. See above
  14. HTH
  15. So 'someone' needs to 'leak' the names/contact details of the '2nd tier' shareholders for this 'non-Lowe camp' share collaboration initiative to work?
  16. I believe there is a public list of 'major' shareholder but I think the most significant list would be the '2nd tier' shareholders....i.e. those with not quite enough to be counted in with the big boys but hold enough shares to make a difference in collaboration with others. In other words, those with, say, a 6 figure shareholding (as opposed to the 7 or 8 figures held by the top table)
  17. Aye...that was my train of thought too...
  18. Shame they weren't in the same Digby wallet as the players wages that someone 'left on a train' (he said metaphorically)
  19. Hence the valiant attempt to pool more shares together per chance...?
  20. Just to clarify...is the 'joining forces' shareholder initiative highlighted on this thread connected in any way to the 'joining forces' initiative that Duncan mentioned previously...i.e. the one where a mobilisation website is being prepared? Or are they completely separate? cheers
  21. I see this morning that another c.12k of shares has been hoovered up at 19p a throw again (12% below the 'asking price'). Probably means nowt....
×
×
  • Create New...