trousers

Source?

Which begs the question...why haven;t the Echo (or anyone else from the media or public at large) questioned this with the club? Seems a bit fundamental to the success of the club if you ask me and yet only a few people on here seem to have recognised as such. Doesn't add up....

So...another thread that drifts to no conclusion. Great.

Venn diagram anyone?

So...another week that promised "significant events" peters out.....surprise surprise...

I suspect it would have given Lowe more pleasure to have 'won' by a much smaller margin with those present voting that it did to win by a landslide due to the large number of abstaintees.

Done. See above

HTH

So 'someone' needs to 'leak' the names/contact details of the '2nd tier' shareholders for this 'non-Lowe camp' share collaboration initiative to work?

I believe there is a public list of 'major' shareholder but I think the most significant list would be the '2nd tier' shareholders....i.e. those with not quite enough to be counted in with the big boys but hold enough shares to make a difference in collaboration with others. In other words, those with, say, a 6 figure shareholding (as opposed to the 7 or 8 figures held by the top table)

Aye...that was my train of thought too...

Shame they weren't in the same Digby wallet as the players wages that someone 'left on a train' (he said metaphorically)

Hence the valiant attempt to pool more shares together per chance...?

Just to clarify...is the 'joining forces' shareholder initiative highlighted on this thread connected in any way to the 'joining forces' initiative that Duncan mentioned previously...i.e. the one where a mobilisation website is being prepared? Or are they completely separate? cheers

:)

I see this morning that another c.12k of shares has been hoovered up at 19p a throw again (12% below the 'asking price'). Probably means nowt....

Cheers for that Weston

My IQ used to be greater than my shoe size before I joined this forum.

Living proof that some on here know **** all....

Rik Waller ?

Indeed. It seems odd that a meeting to attract 'non-Lowe camp' shareholders hasn't actually been publicised very well. A post on a fans forum stating the time and venue without any background info seems a strange way to get people on board. Or perhaps there was a catch-22 at play here....i.e. too much advanced publicity might have scuppered their plans? i.e. they didn't wantto give too much away to the 'Lowe camp'? Dunno. It's all Ted Rogers to me.

I'm told Utah is very nice this time of year