Matthew Le God

They won't be allowed to register them.

No he wasn't.

And if they are downgraded they won't be allowed to do this. Chelsea were one of the main players forcing through EPPP. I'm sure they are more than happy with it and how it fits with their future strategy as they played a key role in writing it. Same applies to Arsenal.

If a club is downgraded what "actions" will it repeat in the future? There is a difference between classification and rules/rule enforcement.

"Enforce"? Enforce what? It isn't a "rule", clubs do not have to blood youngsters. However if they don't then they will be downgraded in an independent auditing procedure. You also haven't answered this... If a club isn't blooding youngsters why would it be so desperate to hold onto category 1 status? It may aswell save time, money and effort and downgrade.

It isn't a "rule", it is categorising a youth system based on strict criteria by an independent auditing body separate from the FA. The two situations are not at all comparable.

Every 2 to 3 years iirc

Of course they aren't examples. They have nothing to do with the auditing procedure of an academy for what tier of a youth system it goes into. If clubs choose not to blood youngsters when a new audit is carried out by the independent company separate from the FA, they will be downgraded. Simple. As I pointed out, Saint Clark makes a good point above, if a club isn't blooding youngsters why would it be so desperate to hold onto category 1 status? It may aswell save money and downgrade.

This is a key point. Why bother hanging on to category one status if you aren't using the benefits that cat 1 provides to your advantage?

I've already answered that, they aren't "making a manager pick youth players". It is entirely his choice (although club policy may now influence him), should the club not give games to youth products the category one status will be downgraded. Have they? How, when and is it comparable to EPPP?

I think that still counts as a compliment.

Schniederlin is our much younger, less good version of Pirlo...

I know this has been mentioned before, but not sure if it came with a link last time... Jay Rodriguez and Jack Butland have the same agent - Gary Mellor, which might play a part in all of this. http://www.beswickssports.com/sport-news/view/article361.htm

Schneiderlin is our defensive midfielder, his role is often to sit just in front of Fonte and Hooiveld, break up opposition attacks and start us going with his range of passing.

Well those clubs are clearly happy with it, hence why they played a large part in the creation of EPPP. The whole thing is mainly so that Premier League clubs can save money by getting the best youth players early and cheap in light of financial fair play regulations coming in. It was originally the FA's idea to improve the England side but the Premier League are using it for their own benefit. These teams aren't spending money on the academies and facilities for nothing, they intend to use their own youth players. Man Utd already have a very good record for this so it is odd you picked them.

No he wasn't. Butland is rated by many in the game to be a competitor for Joe Hart in future years for the England keeper jersey. Forecast has never had such a billing.

They aren't dictated to, clubs can pick who they want. However if they refuse to use any youth players in the first team they lose cat 1 status. Sounds entirely reasonable to base an academy rating partly on the production line rather than solely the bricks/mortar and staffing. Ofsted don't award schools "outstanding" overall, if their students don't get good grades despite having superb teachers and facilities.

The audits are carried out by an independent company, the rules were written and largely influenced by the heads of the top academies. Even still, Newcastle look to be missing out on cat 1 status after the first audit. That decision will stand if that is what the audit company tell the FA to do.

See post #345

I actually said this... "I don't see that number rising hugely over the coming years as it is hard for a Championship club to afford to maintain the running costs and build up in the first place and when some smaller Premier League teams drop out of the top flight they may downgrade to tier 2 so it could end up evening itself out." You decided to cherry pick and take the opening words of my statement out of context.

The top clubs are the ones that forced through EPPP in the first place. They have pretty much written it as it stands. Does that not suggest to you they are happy with it?

Because it will be accessed over a period of seasons, if they don't meet the requirements and make excuses they will simply lose their cat 1 status. As I've already asked... I've read a draft of the EPPP document, have you?

If the manager doesn't play any youth products, the club run the risk of losing category 1 status. They aren't forcing clubs to use youth products, but they will lose category one privileges if they don't.

It will be enforced because every 2 to 3 years an independent organisation will perform another audit on each club. I've read a draft of the EPPP document, have you?

That isn't what I said at all. Read it again.