Jump to content

Matthew Le God

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    31617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Matthew Le God

  1. It isn't solely down to him. Cortese, Reed, Wilkins, Crosby and the improved scouting network all play a significant part.
  2. Barnard has played in the Premier League as well.
  3. Why is that relevant?
  4. But they sincerely believe they are doing what is best.
  5. If Saints were to do a Norwich they may not be needed long term so no point burdening the club with long contracts ala Forecast.
  6. What are they then in your interpretation of them?
  7. It isn't directly hurting them is it? It is denying them medical treatment under the delusion prater to their fictional deity will cure them.
  8. The commandments also state that the punishment for breaking most of them is death. Is that a good moral code?
  9. Are the commandments not part of the organised religion? They are meant to be the word of the the Judeo-Christian God.
  10. What if they decide that instead of seeking medical treatment for their child they would pray for them to be healed by God/Jesus? A large number of children have died from curable conditions due to this.
  11. So would you say the commandments are not evil or dangerous?
  12. Did I say every parent? No Did I say force? No - I said "to some extent forces" - there is a difference
  13. Pretty much every religious person "forces" to some extent their children into the same religion. This is why it needs ridiculing - it is dangerous and poisons the whole of society, people don't keep it to themselves no matter how much they say they don't.
  14. Has the Toronto blessing healed any amputees? It isn't in any way evidence for God, it is just a mass delusion. They think they will be effected in a certain way, so that is how they behave (in most cases sincerely I'm sure). Doesn't make them any less deluded though. If this is what God does to you, you should hope he doesn't exist... http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xCeVZ6e2T0E Do you believe in unicorns? If not, why not?
  15. So? At least it is testable. How do you test for God? Do you believe in unicorns? If not, why not?
  16. - Watford are apparently the club he and his family support. - Norwich in the Premier League. I would question why he would choose Watford over Saints for football reasons, but not Norwich in the top flight.
  17. Should Saints ever play at the Olympic stadium it looks like we'll get a worse view than from the away end than at the Withdean... How you could make out what is going on from that far away I don't know!
  18. Is that appropriate for a forum that is used by children? I didn't want to see it either.
  19. Numerous media outlets are reporting it as Q.P.R. that made the bid.
  20. It is shame that this place isn't big enough for the billions of people it is required for or still in operation...
  21. Neither of them exist. But I have yet to see a photo of God, where as...
  22. So it is okay for a creator not to have creator, but not okay for the universe not to have a creator?
  23. Single electronic orbitals in a molecule were recently imaged by high speed lasers: http://www.nature.com/physics/highlights/7020-3.html A single electron trapped in a quantum dot detected: http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005AIPC..772..775S http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005cond.mat.10269G At least they are testable through scientific method, rather than blind faith using prehistoric and bronze age myth to explain things early man couldn't understand.
  24. When I said "infinite regression", I was referring to what created the creator. If you use the logic as you did that something complex needs a creator, the creator himself is complex - why doesn't he need a creator? At which point the original logic collapses.
×
×
  • Create New...