Crouchie's Lawyer

After that shower of s***e performance today against a team who had nothing to play for, I am calling for the players (and coaching staff) to give up this weeks wages and donate it to the 'Save our Saints' funds. Why should we be donating our hard earned money to pay their wages when they dont even give a s**t about battling to the end?! They earn more than most of us and yet dont seem to care. 1 weeks wages to them is not a lot of money, so I urge you players and coaching staff involved in todays debacle to give up your weeks wages as an apology to the people who pay them and to help save the club you have had a hand in ruining.

Essentially we are in the same position as Charlton were before todays games. Down, but not officially confirmed. There is no way we willwin the last 2 games with the dross on the field that we are playing with. No heart, no commitment, no desire. Even if we did win, we need the other teams to get no points which just isnt going to happen. Forest and Norwich have both showed a desire we lack to get out of the situation they are in. I only hope that now it's pretty much confirmed what division we will be in next year, a buyer gets sorted out asap. Clear all the crap out (including that useless w**ker financial director) and start again. I just prey that the tyre kickers are not wasting valuable time and getting in the way of any possible serious bid.

****ing ****

Speak for yourself sunshine. Will fit like a glove for me!

Her sister looks a little like Karen from Shameless

It's one of those wrong ones, which no matter how much I know I shouldnt, I probably would. She is not all that special, but I dunno, there is just something about her

How rude of me, I forgot the mandatory picture

Would you? There was a program on about her doing up a house last night. I cant decide if I would or not. She is not all that to look at but there is something about her. Discuss.

Or so potty-mouth Ponty can call people c*nts when they don't share the same views as him...

Right I'm off, I have an appointment with a car sales man about buying my third Bugatti Veyron, two just aren't enough! After that I am off to speak with a developer about building my 'Saturday' home for me. Nothing too big, just a small 9 bedroom jobby in the centre of London. Oh and finally I have a date tonight with Charlize Theron, but better keep that schtum as the old ball and strife Jessica Alba wont be too happy to find out! Busy day eh? Laters

I would have seriously lolled if you had got to the end of that mamouth post and the internet had timed out and you lost it all! Fair point though even if it did come across a bit 'look at me'. This comment made me laugh though: Fearing your life after posting on a forum? This isnt the FBI most wanted forum you know, it's a forum discussing SFC!

*Twitter *Fanatics which believe so much in religion they live their life according to it and are willing to sacrifice things for it, including their own life and the life of others! IMO I like the idea of an afterlife but I am not willing to 'waste' my whole life committing to something I have no whole proof exists and in turn not enjoying my life. *Gheys - how can you not find a fine female attractive and want to bone her?! *People who idolise 'meh' celebs like Jade Goody, Kerry Katona etc etc and buy those stupid crappy mag's like Heat and Hello. *Friends - the TV show. Enough with it already, its been milked dry, it just aint funny anymore.

Quality show and that girl is a fittie. Does everyone watch right to the end? After the credits? Last week they showed Lillian (who had earlier been playing tennis on the wii) doing the famous tennis scratching bum pose. They always have funny clips at the end.

Take note a certain admin, you foul mouthed smeg.

Skate-hate you need to appreciate that your views are distorted by the bias you show toward SFC. If you asked any mutual fan (ie no team with hatred views to SFC or any teams in or around the relegation fight) to do the same you would probably find that we would be down. The truth is we have to rely on 2 teams messing up for us to stay alive. Even if Forest slip up and we beat them, if Norwich dont slip up, they will be safe and we will still go down. Realist

But why should it take a rascist ill-educated fake celeb to be unfortunate enough to contract cancer to get these girls to go and get checked up? It's all that is wrong with todays 'I want to be a celeb or just like the celebs' attitude of most young women without half a brain. Ill get slated for saying it but it's just another form of wanting to copy celebs, it just so happens that this is probably the first worthy thing that a celeb has done which is being copied in mass. It just annoys me that all these women wouldnt of taken advantage of a very much available facility which can save their life, until a celeb advises them to (indirectly)

Sorry Ponty but 'are right' should contain 9 stars not 4. It's no different that sleeping around without protection but refusing to get checked for STD's. Cervical cancer is obviously a serious illness and early signs can be spotted meaning it stands a good chance of being prevented with simple measures - like smear tests. If people choose not to get these done thinking 'it wont happen to me' or 'I dont have time to do this' then it's not as if they have done everything possible to prevent this. Its like someone who smokes 20 a day who gets cancer. Give up the fags - stand a better chance of not getting cancer. Take smear tests - stand a better chance of spotting the early signs and preventing cancer. It may sound harsh but Jade chose to ignore having these tests even though she (alledgedly) slept around when she was younger and that only changed when something wasnt right, then she even chose to ignore doctors advice about staying for futher tests after the initial one instead chosing to go onto celeb BB again. Hardly the ideal role model to promote girls to get checked up.

Lets just pray that we dont get hit with a 10 point deduction next season as starting League 1 on -10 will mean more than likely we will end up in that division for more than one year

Clucking anoys me that she has been shot to messiah type famedom just because she has cancer. The same people who flood facebook with tributes to 'A loving soul' and talk about her as if she were a modern day Mother Teresa are most likely the same morons who were calling for her head after the race incident on celebrity BB. How easily their views were 'purchased' by clever PR work from a man who preys on the weak easy target celebrities. He must have been kicking himself when that bint Kerry Katona fired him as he could have milked the sheet out of her situation. Then along comes Jade and he must have thought he won the lotto with that one! It annoys me that people say she has done so much for the cancer cause. If women chose to ignore the facility which is available to them to get checked up for cancer then more fool them. Allegedly Jade herself ignored this facility and as such paid the price. If she had a little more intelligence then maybe she would have got checked up sooner and something could have been done. My heart goes out to her little boys as they are left without a mother, however I do not agree with the media hype which has sucked in so many 'sheep' surrounding JG. And dont get me started on her pikey of a husband!

Ocd?

That I couldnt answer I am afraid. I dont know why the law was not 'back dated' if you like. It would have made sense and certainly protected the banking industry from claims like these but whether there was a law or even clause in the contracts or previous consumer credit act which prevented this I dont know?

I am not Credit Issues so I wouldnt know, we (as agents) have not been given a percentage figure to quote. I can tell you that the percentage of applications which have flaws in the credit agreement is very high. Over 90% but this doesnt necessarily deem the agreement unenforcable and can be for something as simple as wrong font type.

Oh you failed to print the rest of the article too... The only statistic I have given is that which has been given to me which is of all the cases which CI have taken in, only 6% of cases have been refunded. Make of that what you will, but CI will issue a refund if the case does not benefit the client or if the agreement is proven to be enforcable. CI are only concentrating on agreements prior to April 2007 so have no need or desire to quote that 50 million agreements are being produced each year as that is current, therefore not applicable. Timescales are always relayed to the client as possibly up to 9 months due to the legal involvement within the case. Every case is different and whilst there have been successes which have turned around within 6 weeks, the majority of cases take a hell of a lot longer than this! So we do not promise 'fast results' or completion within a short period of time. We do not quote 100% success rate either. In fact we do not quote a success rate at all. Every case is different and a lot of cases are still in their early days and going through court, so to quote success rates at this stage is misleading and incorrect. And I would never advise of a positive outcome all the time. I merely state the facts and know with the solid refund policy in place, if the client is unsuccessful, it has only cost them £50.

Thats funny as there are a load of cases which have successfully completed that state otherwise! And just because they cannot easily be challenged, doesnt mean they cannot successfully be challenged. It just means you need a company with the nouse and experience to do it for you. The legal body behind Credit Issues are not just you run of the mill legal firm. They specialise in this stuff alone and have employed the services of the barrister which helped go over the new consumer credit act changes in 2007. If anyone knows there are holes in the old act Im sure its him! With a solid refund policy, Credit Issues would not waste the time, money or resources entering this industry to rip people off of £50 a pop. Considering they dont actually get that £50 anyway, it goes to the solicitor and the costs are far greater than £50 anyway. On every case they refund, they probably make a loss. So there would be no point doing this on a whim or a hope that it may go through, knowing the likelyhood is that it wont. Ok there may be a few smaller bandits out there who are happy to sit on people's upfront fee's and in fact a lot of smaller firms are doing just this waiting for test cases from firms like CI to go through before they do any work on them! As I have previously said CI have publicly distanced themselves from this kind of behaviour and this kind of firm. Time will tell, and there will be doubters out there. Thats fine. But there are success cases. Lenders have already settled on over £1,000,000 of debt so the above article from the financial guru's that are the CAB is IMO a load of carp!

What do you mean? I built my second house there in case of any immenent floods!