Crouchie's Lawyer

TBF MLT pulled that bint from Home and Away, she was quite hawt

TBF MLT pulled that bint from Home and Away, she was quite hawt

What a game though. I was loling at the end of it. Although I hate Arry with a passion, he went up in my opinion but only slightly, for absolutely sh!tting on the skates again. Normally any person that does that is IMO a genius, however, he is still a c*nt, albeit only slightly less of a c*nt than I thought he was last week. Still a c*nt of the highest order though

What a game though. I was loling at the end of it. Although I hate Arry with a passion, he went up in my opinion but only slightly, for absolutely sh!tting on the skates again. Normally any person that does that is IMO a genius, however, he is still a c*nt, albeit only slightly less of a c*nt than I thought he was last week. Still a c*nt of the highest order though

I know there was a big hoo har over the Tevez saga and who actually owned him, however last night I got to thinking (I was quite inebriated, so bear with me), if the rules about player registration were such that a private individual could effectively 'own' a player, how long would it be, before people deemed purchsing a young football player to be an investment? I mean for example, if you approached Saints and offered to buy Surman for £2m, however, they would continue to pay his wages, and you could strike a deal, whereby you would loan him to Saints for x years and review it each time that period expired. If the likes of Man U came in for him they would purchase the registration from you for say £5m making you a £3m profit, or alternatively, they would ask you to loan him to them, whereby they would pay his wages and as an incentive to you, pay you £x for agreeing to loan him to them? Thoughts? The other idea I had for money generation (albeit a pretty poor one) would be for players to have mini adverts on their boots. With HDTV coming in, it would be clearer to see the adverts, but it would generate a few extra pennies.

I know there was a big hoo har over the Tevez saga and who actually owned him, however last night I got to thinking (I was quite inebriated, so bear with me), if the rules about player registration were such that a private individual could effectively 'own' a player, how long would it be, before people deemed purchsing a young football player to be an investment? I mean for example, if you approached Saints and offered to buy Surman for £2m, however, they would continue to pay his wages, and you could strike a deal, whereby you would loan him to Saints for x years and review it each time that period expired. If the likes of Man U came in for him they would purchase the registration from you for say £5m making you a £3m profit, or alternatively, they would ask you to loan him to them, whereby they would pay his wages and as an incentive to you, pay you £x for agreeing to loan him to them? Thoughts? The other idea I had for money generation (albeit a pretty poor one) would be for players to have mini adverts on their boots. With HDTV coming in, it would be clearer to see the adverts, but it would generate a few extra pennies.

My pocket!

My pocket!

Im on my work laptop and dont have firefox however the good old printy screeny trick did the job!

Im on my work laptop and dont have firefox however the good old printy screeny trick did the job!

Yup, that about sums up what being famous can do for your bedtime life. I would like to be famous for a bit

Yup, that about sums up what being famous can do for your bedtime life. I would like to be famous for a bit

No worries, I agree, I would have seen to her more than three times, however, I feel he would have been onto the next beauty after a few days, and if they are all queuing up, I would hate to disappoint!

No worries, I agree, I would have seen to her more than three times, however, I feel he would have been onto the next beauty after a few days, and if they are all queuing up, I would hate to disappoint!

That was precisely the idea I had! That wasnt the problem phil, the problem was when you clicked on the picture, it didnt give you the option to copy, save print etc as it's copywrited. Just came up with a 'copywrite 2008 blah blah blah' message, but its sorted now. Did you get the PM?

That was precisely the idea I had! That wasnt the problem phil, the problem was when you clicked on the picture, it didnt give you the option to copy, save print etc as it's copywrited. Just came up with a 'copywrite 2008 blah blah blah' message, but its sorted now. Did you get the PM?

You cant seriously say #1 or #6 are fat? They have perfect bodies!

You cant seriously say #1 or #6 are fat? They have perfect bodies!

Sorry Phil, the pictures on the Sun website are copywrited so unable to copy & paste. Actually I have an idea....

Sorry Phil, the pictures on the Sun website are copywrited so unable to copy & paste. Actually I have an idea....

I chose 5 or 6

I chose 5 or 6

I think you have to PM Bajjer

I think you have to PM Bajjer

Yes and no. When you chose to get a job in the public eye and become a 'celeb' you have to take the bitter with the sweet. You will earn alot, have the best choice of girls, have all the nicest things in life, but you have to accept bad things will be said about you and possibly your family. I do not agree with what they did, but he is not a normal pensioner, he is a (albeit from the past) celeb. I think what they said is horrific, but IMO, she will do very well out of this, she has already appeared topless in the Sun, so she is hardly distraught and devistated is she? Infact, for her 'career' this is only a good thing and IMO, if it means her grandad being a bit upset, Im sure it wont bother her! The first thing I do when Im upset, is whap my mewbs out. She has sold her story to anyone who will buy it and consequently, furthering her 'fame'. Although I agree it was wrong, its getting beyond a joke now with everyone jumping on the bandwagon complaining.