Whitey Grandad

If he buys a coffee then he's a customer.

Sky always give the time that their coverage starts and not kickoff times.

Then we should be sanctioned for employing him.

'Utmost good faith' is meaningless and undefinable. It also includes 'kicking the shit out of the opposition during matches'.

They are unlikely to have been submitted yet. Or they may have been prematurely shredded.

I was thinking more of a 'wildlife activity cam' with a live streaming facility. You can get one called a 'lesser spotted defender cam'

The independent hearing.

Indeed. There is a plethora of monitoring equipment that could be fixed to a tree, for example, or some other convenient goalpost. Such equipment can be remotely monitored and recorded. Virtually untraceable and untrackable.

That depends on where the cash comes from. If it's already in your bank account then the value hasn't increased.

You haven't seen my nose 😉

Would that be a degree of William Salt? From what I know he hasn't graduated yet.

Prejudicial to say the least. Why would there have to be a denial? There are different degrees of transgression. What if, for example, we sent someone up there on the Tuesday to do an analysis but he then got carried away and forgot what day it was?

Exactly. This whole regulation has not been thought through. What if said 'analyst', and let's be honest everyone on this forum is some sort of analyst, does not charge for his opinions and reports?

What, the intern who is no longer an employee and hasn't been since at least two days before the first leg and who can't be located or contacted and was last rumoured to be backpacking in the Andes? Or it might have been sailing single-handedly across the Atlantic? (reports differ)

But does it though? If so, why us there a further mention of "within 72 hours"? Or is it a matter of "You're not allowed to do it, but if you do, don't do it within 72 hours of a match between the pair of you".

Indeed. And if Middlesbrough introduce new 'evidence' after the EFL charges have been made, does that extend the 14 day response window?

Interesting... If SFC has not paid, suggested or encouraged you to do so then my view is that they should be in the clear. If you recorded this before the 72 hour embargo then could they watch it after the embargo started?

I've not seen that anywhere.

Different legal maximum apply in different legal environments. Basically I believe ours is: "Ubi lex voluit dixit, ubi noluit tacuit" In other words, "Unless the law says you can't, you can" Otheres have "Unless the law says you can, you can't "

If that were me hiding behind that tree I'd stick out in five places.

Within the 72 hours?

Not within the 72 hours embargo so therefore perfectly acceptable and not 'cheating' or 'spying'.

I've only seen the last two but I've seen photos of the shirt pull on Stewart. How that wasn't given we shall never know. Aylingn on Scienza was just a touch on the chest and a theatrical dive. Leo would have been better advised to stay on his feet. Latin I agree with you.

How do you know that?