Jump to content

Whitey Grandad

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    30,708
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Whitey Grandad

  1. Or that Will Salt is not the culprit.
  2. And who would be exposing himself to a massive legal claim.
  3. Within 72 hours?
  4. For me, Gibson looks like Gene Hackman there.
  5. Sell it for medical research?
  6. That top will stand out like a giant daffodil in a forest.
  7. They can meet online.
  8. Every journalist writes for his own readership.
  9. You can bet your boots that there have and will be 'informal' discussions amongst the affected parties. Probably in a toilet cubicle somewhere.Something along the line of "How would you feel about..."
  10. I don't think I've seen that anywhere.
  11. Two seats end of row 7
  12. I'd prefer a tree to lean against.
  13. I had the usual scare once I had entered the system. It told me that I was not authorised as usual. Abit of clicking around and eventually I got there.
  14. It took me very nearly an hour. The queue was being process at about 100 per minute. We are in block 247
  15. "Position in queue: 5648"
  16. Only ITV Tyne Tees
  17. Well to be fair, the coroner had already ruled that it was an accident.
  18. 'Making an example' is the very definition of disproportionality.
  19. And not just the 72 hours bit. 'Spying' is just not an issue.
  20. Thanks, that's worth knowing.
  21. To be fair the name on the flag is a bit of a giveaway.
  22. This is what I don't get. That Thursday, two days before one of their most important games in years, you might expet even a few Karenbrough fans to be interested in watching their heroes train. So a young man in casual clothes taking photos on his phone would be nothing unusual. Remember, at this stage there is no reason to suspect a football spy to be involved. Yet their security staff get all officious, demand that he delete any photos or videos and follow him to the clubhouse toilets. Then go to the trouble of allegedly finding out his name from a credit card transaction and search through SFC website photos for a possible match. The only photograph that they have published is low definition and partly obscured by his phone. That is not enough on its own to positively identify anyone. Why were they so absolutely convinced that he was a Southampton FC employee? Paranoia is not enough to explain their behaviour. Unless they had further information.
  23. Was I standing next to a tree at the time and streaming the view on my phone? Oops, what a giveaway 🥵
  24. Is it illegal to stare at a flasher? (Asking for a friend)
×
×
  • Create New...