Whitey Grandad

Indeed. Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?

I don't believe in conspiracy theories. Of course the landings were genuine. The clincher for me is the way that the image of the Earth is portrayed ever since the landings. Before them it was always shown like it is in atlases with no clouds and nothing like as blue as we now know it to be. As for the flag, the important fact is that it doesn't wave when nobody is waving it by twisting the pole. If there were any air around then it would move at the slightest breath. I remember one comment saying that the moon lander's feet pads should be covered in dust because when it landed all the dust would be blown about and some was bound to have landed on them but any derbrain would understand that the dust would all be blown away from the lander and would follow ballistic trajectories and not return to cover the feet. The arguments that the conspiracists put forward all seem to be based on a lack of understanding of the physics of space.

Please remember that some drivers may not be local, the road markings may be obscured by other vehicles and that at nighttime when it's raining it can be impossible to see any markings at all.

They're not. There are some very strict fitness tests that they have to pass.

Nobody in that photo is committing an offence. It's what happened later that matters.

What is that photo suposed to illustrate?

Ah, I thought it was free when I first got it. £3 seems a lot for any App.

It's responsible for broadcasting the recording and promoting their actions. You should never broadcast anything without the other party's permission, in the same way that you shouldn't publish photographs without approval.

I use Tapatalk, it's free.

There does not have to be contact for it to be a foul. The wording of the law is 'trip or attempt to trip'. Having said that, you would normally only give a foul if the offended player had found it necessary to take evasive action from the swinging leg and thereby had lost possession, or maybe stumbled.

Names?

Who are we going to blame?

Sir Patrick Moore, please. I have always enjoyed his programmes and only yesterday I watched the most recent Sky at Night. A wonderful enthusiast for his subject and the heavens will seem a little bit emptier. Perhaps they can name a star after him? I have his Atlas of the universe from 1970, I must go there someday. Thanks, old chap.

If I survive, can I come on here for advice? It's not the apocalypse that worries me, it's having to rely on you lot afterwards.

No, I can't agree with that. Don't stick anything in your ears that's smaller than your elbow.

Wasn't there a foul just before the ball hit Mertesacker?

They didn't show it on MOTD, shame as I was looking forward to seeing it again. Where did you see it?

Yes, but that was every week.

So do I.

He did ok. Shame he didn't score.

I know what it isn't.

Why not combine both?

There's a big difference between taking and earning. That's what this debate is all about.

But that's not fair. Some of the world will get longer than other parts! Perhaps it will be a rolling apocalypse, arriving with the daybreak? Or sunset? Maybe even afternoon tea. If we all go without our tea at four o'clock then perhaps we can be saved after all. See, there's always hope.

Whatever you may think, it cannot possibly be 'greedy' to aspire to earn more money and keep a reasonable proportion of it. Greed is when you want to take money away from somebody else so you can have an easier life yourself. Some call it sponging.