Sheaf Saint

Yes, only over a vastly longer time period than we are seeing currently. That is a good question, and the answer is approximately 100% https://www.carbonbrief.org/analysis-why-scientists-think-100-of-global-warming-is-due-to-humans/

No you haven't. You've done what you always do and copy and pasted someone else's work and tried to pass it off as your own.

It's not even about them being racist. It's about them wanting to be seen as being right about something they know nothing about. I remember when the news was breaking about Anders Breivik and numerous people were losing their shit about another Islamist attack, and when that turned out to be untrue there was some serious rowing back going on (like "well, it's a fair assumption") to try and save face about being wrong.

Yes, because although there is always a reasonable chance that is the motive when these things happen, it says an awful lot about someone when they just lazily assume it must be rather than waiting for facts to emerge.

Started watching Fallout on Prime last night. Looks really good so far - love the stylisation. I also recently finished 3 Body Problem on Netflix, and it was decent but perhaps a little disappointing considering the hype and the budget. Visually, it's great in parts. But some of the characters are really annoying, and there are so many massive plot holes that simply don't make sense. Still a solid 7/10 from me though.

There's one born every minute... Truth Social investing is about faith in Trump, not business fundametals - The Washington Post

Or, even better, Henny Youngman.

Sick burn...

Wasnt a fan of his subs today. Why must he always make 5 subs in every game? I get that it's a squad game these days but there's no law saying you have to use all your subs. If we were playing at high intensity then I could understand it. But we don't so it just seems like tinkering for the sake of it.

Oh. My. Word!

Or, just maybe, it's because he's statistically the worst keeper in the Champ. It's not personal at all.

We won't, because that's not in our make up. Last weekend at Blackburn we had an attacking FK in the last minute of stoppage time and we just passed it out wide and gave it away instead of launching it into the box.

He literally passed that into the net.

Oh FFS. Guess it's been coming. Just have to hold on now and not give away a late winner.

Ah, it's so we can push Stephens forward into his midfield maestro role.

He had to wait for some support to arrive, but then just cheaply gave it away again having done the hard work. Very poor from him.

I take your point, but the fact that we have scored from both of them today is against type for us, so I'm not too unhappy.

What a fucking stupid comment. He was having a good game and, in case you didn't notice, was involved in the build up and finished for our first goal. But yeah, let's wish he can't continue 🙄

I'd imagine it will be Rothwell if he can't continue.

Taking Brooks off I can understand, but I thought Aribo was having a good game so that one surprises me.

Some proper wet fannies on here, as always. Seems some people have unrealistic expectations. We're not going to have total dominance for 90 minutes in any game, and we have a busy fixture schedule this month so we can't play at full intensity all the time, so there will always be moments where it looks like we have taken our foot off the gas and invited the oppo back into it. Yes, they have pressed us and forced a few mistakes in our playing out from the back, but that was inevitable with the way they are set up. We still look the much better team going forward and are deserving of our lead.

https://enjoysports.xyz/100/ehd-9.php

Ipswich equalise

Ipswich 0-1 Boro