Turkish

If we sign the 4-5 quality players we need to add depth then top 10 is a very real possibility.

He isn't first choice, he's played about 40 games in two years, squad player for them too.

They could put pictures of MLT on the scoreboards with NC singing it in his direction and encouraging the crowd to point to the scoreboards and all sing along 'shadd pupa ya face' at the relevant point on the song. Imagine a 30,000 crowd all singing that and pointing to the scoreboards, it would be CRAZY.

Thats him. I always thought he looked a good player, he's played about 40 games for them. Wouldn't be a first team player for us but decent option for cover at CM and CB. From the sides going down, Callum MCManaman looks decent.

When you are consistently shown up to be clueless and you have to resort to Leaping on a predictive text error on a thread you arent even involved in this far, its time to bow out Mr Wrong, its getting embarassing for you.

You really are utterly pathetic.

Micheal Maccinenne. Can player centre half or central midfield, would be a decent addition to the squad IMO.

Quite a few apostles. LUKE Shaw MATTHEW Le Tissler Stern JOHN PAUL Allen PETER Rodrigues MARK Dennis

I don't think it would be a miracle for him to join us.

Not so Good at dealing with crosses I've heard.

Maybe we could rewrite the words to YMCA and get the fans sing along and to do the actions in the build up to the game, just before the players come out, that would me MENTAL.

Given the popularity Of some previous players it seems the only attribute people want is pace.

Which bits re made up? Didn't the club say they were going to defend themselves then? People on here are claiming that it was just a case of not being able to agree compensation, if that's the case what were they preparing, or not as it turned out, to defend themselves against? And its not the first time its happened is it, remember the small company who had done work on the stadium interior that got settled out of court the day before?? So, none of it is made up is it Frankie Boy, its more that you don't like what you read so accuse me of trolling and making things up.

It wasn't. So what's your point?

If it was just a case of agreeing what was owed why were the club claiming only a few weeks ago they were going to 'defend themselves rigourously'?

It's pretty clear Saints caved in and were in the wrong. One day they are claiming they are going to 'defend themselves riurously' - why make that statement if there is nothing to defend or its just a matter of meeting in the middle as to what compensation is owed? This follows the precident that we've had of falling out with companies and people and then settling out of court in the days before, letting it all drag on and on. People can attempt to spin it and defend the club how they want too andif this is the only time this has happened then they may have a point, the fact is that it isn't.

Yep, Not defending ourselves after saying we would and settling out of court, again, is doing it wonders.

Point of principle you say? Well read the statement again, the club say they will defend themselves rigorously in the best interests of the club and it reputation. They've decided now not to defend themselves, you have to wonder why this is.

http://www.dailyecho.co.uk/sport/saints/news/10209908.Saints_cancel_Le_Tissier_meeting/ They were going to 'defend themselves rigorously' according to this statement. Thy didn't.

Yes I did prefer it before celebrity chairman when it was all about the team, but If you can't beat them join them.

If it was just a one off then you'd give them the benefit of the doubt, it isn't though is it.

Did your company decide to do this a couple of days before the hearing was due, not just on this legal case but on other occasions as well? This after publicly denying any wrong doing and claiming that they would 'defend themselves vigorously' against the allegations?

They didn't defend themselves, they settled out of court, so either they rolled over or knew they wouldn't win. What do you think it is?

Player for player, they have more that are quicker.

Correct. Such a shame Mr Wrong had to turn it into an arguement about if our players are as quick as Spurs or not, very odd.