Turkish

I'm well aware of that. What i object to is you calling me thick because i dared to suggest that your opinion might not be shared by everyone. It seems you're incapable of considering other peoples views without resorting to insults and working yourself up into a little rage, quite sad really.

This is clearly propoganda.

I'll ask again. 1 WHy would you stay in a religion if you did not adhere to its teachings and principles? 2 Why would you stay in a religion that did not approve of your way of life? 3 Why would you want the blessing on your marriage of this religion that you do not follow correctly so are clearly not devout?

So why are you calling me thick for saying that your opinion might not reflect the opinions ond views of a multitude of other people, especially in a country which celebrates multiculturalism and freedom of worship? What about the views of parents who want their children to attend a religious school like children in this country have for hundreds of years? It seems to be you that is having the problem understanding that and not me.

3Eligibility. heres the legislation of it from the civil partnership act 2004. (1)Two people are not eligible to register as civil partners of each other if— . (a)they are not of the same sex, . (b)either of them is already a civil partner or lawfully married, . ©either of them is under 16, or . (d)they are within prohibited degrees of relationship. The Act grants civil partnerships in the United Kingdom with rights and responsibilities identical to civil marriage It seems straight people aren't allowed them. I demand they are. So who sees them as a lesser relationship and why aren't straight couples allowed civil partnerships?

average age 14 average height 5ft 2 average hair colour -blonde

So why cant civil partnerships be viewed equally and of the same status? Who views them as a lesser relationship?

Why the personal insults? Thats your view because religion isn't important to you, but it is to a lot of people. Now think of the bigger picture, not just your little corner of Hampshire of whereever you live.

I haven't ducked the valid points. Its a very simple notion. Why would you stay in a religion that didn't approve of your way of life? Why would you stay in a religion where you did not live by their moral code? If you dont do the later then you clearly aren't devout, so why do you care if you have their blessing or not?

Probably, we were quoted and bid about £6m for Phillips so for an extra couple of million you'd get a much better player.

Why would you want to be part of a religion which didn't approve of the way you conducted your life? WHy would you be a devout *insert name of religion* if you did not live by their principle? And unless you were a devout *insert name of relgion* why do you care if they bless you or not?

Im not saying they should be. However if i was gay and the religion i may have been raised in didn't approve of my sexuality, then i would no longer be part of that religion so wouldn't want it's blessing. Surely this makes perfect sense. You might not be able to choose your sexuality but you can choose your religion. I dont understand why you would want to be part of something that didn't approve of you and then by default want the approval of something that you weren't part of.

It's difficult to assume that someone is correct when they are an 18 year old hetrosexual talking about why gay people want to gay married and appearing to speak on their behalf.

They continued this notion during the early games of last season, even when it soon became apparant the only thing he had in his locker was pace. The same thing is happening with Tanadari Lee, we've been told many times on here what a great player he is and he's going to have a massive impact, based on seeing him play against Derby and Barnsley last season.

I dont need a BBC report to explain it, i'm fully aware. What i'm saying is why cant gay people by happy with civil partnerships and use it as celebration of their sexuality, rather than considering it in some way a lesser relationship? why not be proud and say to the world "We're gay, we dont do marriages, Civil partnerships are our thing!" rather than having the chip on the shoulder that your relationship as a homosexual is in someway worth less than that of a hetrosexual person.

Ince without question.

But why not celebrate what you've got? Be proud of your civil partnership, use it in a positve way to express your homosexuality and how happy and comfortable they are with it. Why do they want to be the same at hetrosexual couples? It might lead to hetosexuals wanting civil partnerships instead of marriage!!!

We have no cover for that position at all. Whats Iago Falque up to these days? HCDAJFU.

True, and Lallana wont even need to to fly back to Ecuador for knee surgery every five minutes.

Quite. We keep being told the church needs to move with the times. Well if it's that arachic and bigotted why do they wants it's blessing?

Is it? He appears to be speaking for gay people and what they want.

It's not though is it. Gay people can have a civil partnerships, why not celebrate that fact. Why not be proud of what you have and celebrate that being your thing, rather than wanting something else.

Really? are you speaking for them Andy? You know this the case do you?

Looking on the brightside, if he's injured for the whole of January and after he wont be leaving.

Why do they want the blessing of the church though? Why not be happy with what they have?