Turkish

So If I got that bit right why don’t you believe the rest of it? Not part of the acceptable narrative I guess. It offensive because someone decided it is i also didn’t mention that the chant started again in the 80s as Ken bates bought and owned the stadium and Chelsea were again renting it from him, hence Chelsea rent boys. not sure Why you would think Chelsea would post on their history oftheir stadium history page that in latter years other fans would use it as a means to mock them 🙄

Saints and Norwich both sing songs from over 100 years ago, so it's possible.

The original chant was to the tune of once in royal David’s city it went once in England’s capital city stood a lonely athletics track there a team from west london Paid the rent to take it back with the poor and meek and lowly chelseas rents boys played there only but it’s been shortened over the years to just Chelsea rent boys an now the wokies have decided it’s offensive 🙄

I got covid 3 months after being vaccinated. I had no side effects from the vaccines (AZ), Covid for me was like a heavy cold. Wife had a minor side effects, light cold and tiredness, she also got covid and was same as me. My brother, sister in law both got it and were the same as us. Son and Niece you wouldn't have known they've have. I'll for sure take a booster though, dont really understand why anyone wouldn't. They did always say they'd be needed

Maybe you need to do some more research than just take the first thing you read as face value. It may have been jumped on as a homophobic chant but the origins stem from something different. I remember Wimbledon and Charlton fans also faced similar abuse when they were homeless.

"i think it was a Chelsea headhunter" "there was probably an expose in the sun" Yeah that's really credible

Yes. I forgot the bit where the Norwich fan said "there was probably an expose in the Sun" Also here other comment on "wouldn't it be great if all Chelsea fans were gay" isn't very inclusive!

Two VERY reliable sources. A student in califronia and an LGBT Norwich fan who thinks it was started by a Chelsea headhunter

Prove me wrong

Sadly for you i dont. Had plenty of people call me a cunt on here and other things, sad really that it makes you so angry reading my opinions, but i guess that says more about you than me.

The difference being MLG were in a discussion, this guy waded in calling me a cunt on a discussion he wasn't involved in. The sole purpose of the post was to be abusive.

Put me on ignore then, not hard.

i think this is the very definition of an abusive post.

I see many are stuck in the Dell sized mentality. We were assured there would be a mad scramble for tickets with new fans from all over the place looking for a club to support coming here for their fix of premier league football.

I think you’ll find that this isn’t a homophobic chant. The originals of the chant refer back to the fact that Stamford bridge was originally an athletics stadium and also offered to Fulham before Chelsea took over the rental of The stadium. Hence the originals of the stadium refer back to the time Chelsea were tenants in a stadium not offered to them not built for football. Still let’s not let the facts get in the way of some handwringing

A champions league game played on a 4G pitch tonight but Harrogate and Sutton had to rip theirs up and miss out on significant commercial revenue to play in league two 🤷🏽‍♂️

I remember the days when we had ambitions with the league cup being beneath us the attitude being it was champions league or nothing. At least we got one of those two options.

Dynamic pricing I believe it’s called. Stunning idea and completely flawless.

Well in that case hats off to Bradford for getting it spot on. Saints take note you can get big crowds in a pandemic of the price is right

FFS. I simply commented Bradford had 17,000 which is superb for a league two club in reply to someone else saying there were some good lower league crowds. I really am not interested in why or how. Banging on about how they compare to saints prices or pandemics or average cost per game is not the point in what was a very simple post.

What the fuck are you on about? I simply commented about Bradfords attendances in reply to JRM saying there have been some good crowds in the lower leagues. It had fuck all to do with cost per match, pandemics or how affordable season tickets are. Just a comment about a specific clubs attendances in reply to a comment about good lower league crowds. As usual you’ve waded in and made a knob of yourself.

What has that got to do with anything?

Bradford had 14k for their last home games, 17k for the first game of the season. Superb for a league 2 club

Maybe it’s because women’s tennis is a very high standard and attracts large support whereas women’s football is a shit standard and the top teams attracts crowds smaller than some conference clubs get. Yet it’s still advertised and promoted like it’s on a par with mens. I know you’re taking the moral high ground on this though whilst stalking me so you keep believing what you want pal.

👏👏👏👏👏👏👍