Again you are clearly misunderstanding my point. The photograph debacle, the shambles that is the corporate areas despite being in the Premiership, the stopping of the training ground improvements, the shambles of the ticket office getting a myriad of things wrong, the huge turnover of staff (meaning that we lose staff doing a really decent job such as David Luker.) My point was that there was more to the job of a CEO than just how we do for a season or two and I used an example of where a football club could be doing well on the pitch but a CEO could still perform poorly in other areas and do harm to the football club. At no point did I state that Cortese had done anything to the academy. I can't explain it any clearer.