hypochondriac

Big assumption. I bet they don't

It didn't make me wrong. I knew that article existed before I made my original comment. I'm sure United expressed a passing interest but no way did United make a firm offer and he turned them down for us.

Skates are going mental now they look not to be getting a points deduction. Personally I think that is an absolute disgrace. Corp Ho is going on about how we know nothing about it on here as per usual. It is disgusting to think they will cheat and get away with it again.

They don't. It's an illusion to make the fans feel part of the bid.

Lol. It means nothing to the national game. This sort of sickening stuff is going to be trotted out for months.

The completion of the deal doesn't require the pledges. Apparently they will be used for things like transfer budget.

Utter rubbish imo

Clyne didn't turn down United for us. Lmao.

Probably because Tesco would not get planning permission if they did it without pfc.

Tesco would pay for the redevelopment I think. The Trust would pay back the developers I imagine with a small amount of interest?

Pretty sure it was threatened on more than one occasion.

I provided a service for him (no not that sort for the dirty minded) and as a consequence we had quite a few friendly conversations. Can't tell you exactly was because then you may know who I am and we can't be having that. I don't want to get beaten up by the six brothers!

The idea is to buy it and then develop the stadium along with someone like Tesco.

Why? I didn't really post much about him previously. You're right though I don't know him particularly well.

Seems Mike's brother doesn't think so.

Would this be a bad time to mention that I am actually an acquaintance of Mike and he was actually a nice bloke? Few years back mind you before all the SFC stuff. Maybe he has got all litigious since then.

I'm not the one who suggested it, it was the semi-pro manager derry.

I suggest you read my comment above or derry's comments since the start of thread to get a clearer understanding...

Because derry said: The inference being that Mike's brothers would either inform Mike about this thread or assist him in getting this to court. Ridiculous really.

No one. Yet. Derry is suggesting that the opening post may cause problems because Mike or his brothers (one of which is probably you) could potentially launch legal action for defamation. I know exactly what I'm talking about.

LMAO! So now the mods may be included in any legal action because they failed to delete the 'defamation.' Gold thread.

Are you Mike Osman's brother? What I'm saying is that the type of people who run around handing out frivolous lawsuits are the type of people I don't want anywhere near SFC because I know what they are like.

Lol! Genuinely made me laugh.

If he sues for defamation because of that opening post then he is a lot worse than anyone could have imagined. I despise those who threaten to sue others and go through with frivolous lawsuits. Mike's reputation as a public figure would be harmed far more if he went through with anything like that against a member of this forum.

I suspect the comment about the 70K appearance fee. If you remember, Mike and his brothers have been particularly *****ly with threatening legal action against people on here in the past (was one of them called the gaffer or am I imagining that?) Goes to show exactly what these type of people are though. I'm glad individuals of this kind are no longer involved with SFC.