hypochondriac

I trust the IAEA and their reporting. I'm also clearly going to take more seriously in general things coming from America and Israel over despotic religious death cults running countries like Iran. That doesn't mean blindly believing anyone clearly but some people hate certain characters or countries to such an extent that they will even side with the likes of Iran. A regime that has sent young boys to die running into minefields to glorify Allah.

Yes.

All of them have nuclear weapons which is obviously a consideration. Yet another reason to prevent Iran from gaining them.

Also an authoritarian religious fundamentalist regime who oppress and murder their own people particularly minorities and women, has been attacking Israel via proxies for years, funds terrorism around the world, refers to America as the great Satan and has declared their intention to destroy Israel if ever given the opportunity to do so. Oh and they breached their agreements around nuclear energy according to the IAEA and enriched uranium to really high levels. So seems like quite a lot of reasons to strike their nuclear sites and call for regime change then.

Form is temporary and all that. Has all the attributes to make the step up. He's one I'd like to see given a go.

Who knows. Maybe it's wrong

Fair enough if true. If not though not a chance are they getting that for him

I'm still holding out hope for Richard kone from Wycombe. Can score goals in English football, big strong and pacy and won't cost much at all. To my mind that's a much safer bet than some others mentioned.

Alfie house emphasising we are looking for someone with a bit of pace though and the koln forum and player profiles sort of confirm he doesn't have much of that so not sure it is him.

I don't think most people will moan about signing youth unless we don't get enough experience to complement it. One thing we do know about this league is how important it is to have people with experience in it who can navigate the highs and lows of the season. I accept some of or players can do that but I'd prefer some fresh blood from elsewhere.

Here's a good and short video about why Iran should never get a nuclear bomb:

Miles better than soggy biscuit Lallana. Would get some real excitement at the club too.

OK so as far as I'm aware there are no alternative reasons for enriching uranium to that degree. Agreed?

1) Right so they have the capability to produce a nuclear bomb but there's no evidence at all that Japan have the intention to do so. As opposed to Iran who actually have highly enriched uranium that only has one use as far as I am aware which is to use it to produce a nuclear bomb or as you claim to make people think they want to produce a nuclear bomb. 2) I isn't understand your point. There's no reason to enrich uranium to 60% other than to build a bomb or to pretend that you want to build a bomb which I agree is absurd. The act of enriching uranium to that percentage is evidence enough of their intentions. There's no other plausible explanation for them doing it.

1) You made the claim and then tell me to look it up. I haven't seen any claims either online or offline that Japan have enriched uranium to a high degree. Where is the evidence that they are further down the road to a nuclear bomb than Iran? 2) All Iran have succeeded in doing is getting their regime destroyed. I haven't seen the theory outside of this forum that Iran were just pretending to attempt to build a nuke. I don't see why that would be more likely or more beneficial for them than to actually just go ahead and try to get away with actually building one given the leverage and strength it would give their regime.

Think I've said before that I'd like Sargent.

Come on saints. Get Tadic in. You know it makes sense.

Do you have any evidence for the claim that Japan have highly enriched uranium to the point that they were closer than Iran appear to be? Do we have any evidence that Iran were prepared to roll back their enrichment and allow inspections? It seems to be the opposite was the case.

So they were pretending to get close to building a bomb for leverage? Spending billions on the required technology with no intention of ever actually acquiring one? And that's more likely than actually just secretly building a bomb?

Is it your contention that Iran were enriching uranium to 60% for entirely innocent and non nuclear bomb related reasons? Do you have any evidence for that claim? Have Japan and South Africa enriched uranium to 60% for that purpose?

I'm not a scientist but do you have any links that show any alternative reasons for enriching uranium to 60% other than preparing to develop a bomb?

Sorry is the enriched uranium story being disputed?

They were clearly along the path towards a nuclear bomb. If you don't want them to get one at what point is it acceptable to intervene?

Except that the wmd stuff was invented. Iran actually has the enriched uranium which is a clear attempt to make nukes so it's not the same at all.

Some saying Evan Ferguson.