-
Posts
44,095 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by hypochondriac
-
Jos was better than Fonte? Really? Where were you sat?
-
I think that is unfair. Cork was played out of position and I don't think he was better than Fonte at all tbh. In your world that means you will dismiss my opinion because he is a 'fan favourite.' In reality, Fonte was actually decent and I thought Jos was OK but dodgy at points.
-
I don't understand your comment there tbh. No one is not cutting the team some slack, simply calling it as they saw it. And I disagree, I really don't think we stood up that well to the Forest team. Going forward we were decent and took our chances well, but there is no denying that in quite a few games this season we have given other teams a hell of a lot of chances.
-
I think partially but if I'm honest, I'm not entirely sure how important it was to buy someone like Fox who does look suspect defensively (the main job of a defender.) Jos looked a bit suspect and if he ends up costing us some points, I think we will regret strengthening at LB and possibly neglecting to spend some dosh at CB. Can't believe I am saying this but I think we missed Richardson today. OK he isn't great but he is all we have at the moment and we really missed Cork in the centre. Morgan was pretty anonymous and a bit disappointed in him today.
-
Agree with all of that. I do understand it is his first game and of course he needs time, but he didn't look like much of an improvement over Seaborne which is a shame.
-
If you mean me then yes I was. Itchen north block 4 row h to be precise.
-
I do think the defence is a worry. Whilst we continue to win it doesn't matter but it was the amount of chances that the likes of forest Leicester and even Ipswich created which shows the weakness in our team. Ok you can say we were just promoted but we should still be looking to improve and not be afraid to criticise.
-
Never said he wasn't. I wanted to see how the season progressed and he is certainly doing well. Well done to him and the team.
-
Mixed feelings with this win. Fantastic smash and grab against forest who dominated the entire second half and will feel rightly aggrieved with some of the decisions. Fox was awful and got done numerous times. New defender was bad too heading straight up in the air. How forest failed to score more than twice I will never know. They were clearly better than us in the second half. Still we won and lambert was superb. Excellent result and the type we will need if we want to do well.
-
Damn I would have had that...
-
Our City is Beautiful, Our Parks are amazing..
hypochondriac replied to 1976_Child's topic in The Lounge
How on earth did you find this? Did you search parks? -
Who is a member of a political party or NGO?
hypochondriac replied to View From The Top's topic in The Lounge
Very interesting that Dr Who is a labour supporter. For the record, I am not a member of any party but at the moment it is the Tory party who I feel are the best choice to lead the country after the Labour c*ck up post Blair. -
I suppose it depends what you mean by being a good singer. As a classically 'good' singer then yes I agree that Dylan is not great.
-
Stupidest thing anyone has ever said
hypochondriac replied to Crazy Diamond's topic in The Muppet Show
Whether you believe in god or not, that is a woeful interpretation of Christianity. -
two hundred quid.
-
Yes apparenty that is all true. Few little extra bits too.
-
Don't really think it's the sellers fault but what should happen is you should get your money back and he should start a claim against UPS.
-
The united fans kicking off at the giddy bridge last year was ridiculous.
-
And on that note, st chalet? Can we finally put this thread out of it's misery?
-
I knew exactly what I was posting though didn't explain it very well. Apologies if you had difficulty following.
-
Because you accused me of not being a fan, because you started a thread harking back to comments made six months previously in a heat of the moment thread with ott comments in it from myself immediately after we have had another disagreement. You then claim it is nothing to do with me and you have no idea how I could come to that conclusion. Well that's rubbish as far as I am concerned. It has nothing to do with the cap fitting on my head. You have an argument with me and then the very next day produce this thread and then pretend that this was a total coincidence. You have a problem with people who post negative views which you deem to be over the top. Well I and others have the exact same problem except the posters I and others cannot stand are those with their blinkered positivity and those who do not allow discussion about a theory or piece of information deemed negative. For every poster on this topic agreeing with you, there is a poster who disagrees and it would be good if posters like yourself took notice of what was said by those posters and thought about what you post before criticising others. If you were prepared to accept that you were part of the problem then perhaps posters like myself would be more inclined to tone down our approach and be less confrontational. Sadly you think it's is everyone elses fault but your own. I am prepared to admit that at time I let emotion get the better of me and that on occasion I can provoke reactions. Are you prepared to look at the shortcomings in your posting?
-
Fantastic. Don't reply then.
-
If Derry believes that is fine for him to label people a problem poster then he should realise that he is also viewed as such by other posters. Having said that, in my opinion it is arrogant to label anyone as a problem poster simply because you disagree with what they say and how they say it and defend themselves. I don't think anyone is a problem poster as such, I do think posters like Derry would do well to be more open minded about topics on here but I would happily have a sensible conversation with him if he was up for it. I don't know why I am bothering to reply to you though tbh. It will probably give you the attention you crave.
-
I am interested in well mannered discussion about football and sfc. It's just that Canada saint and yourself get so offended by posters with an opinion they do not like, that they have to start threads like this designed to cause trouble (whatever he claims) or claim that the likes of myself is not a true fan. I want to discuss saints and theories about sfc in both a positive AND negative way with those prepared to do so. If you have no desire to do that then as you suggest, it would be better if you ignored me.
