Jump to content

hypochondriac

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    43,349
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hypochondriac

  1. Thanks trousers. Im not sure how I could have made it any differently.
  2. No I don't. You've just made that up. In fact, I started a thread about positive stuff I had heard a few weeks ago and I'm always interested in saints info both positive an negative.
  3. But then you are assuming that really sh*t players have unrealistic demands as opposed to decent players demanding what they are worth (and maybe a bit more if there I'd competition.)
  4. It must be sh*te, it's something negative about the club. Has to be rubbish. I wider if your reaction would have been the same had it been a nice positive tweet?
  5. Some people will excuse anything. IF (big if) this is true and we are missing out on players because agents and clubs do not want to deal with us, then I can't see any positive no matter what anyone tries to spin on here.
  6. As are the people who won't even entertain for a moment that there could be just an ounce of truth to this.
  7. That is a stupid and presumptuous statement with so much of the window left. If it gets to the end and we have signed a load of frees or lower fees who don't significantly improve the first team then I will join you with what you say.
  8. I agree we probably do have money to play with. The big question is how much exactly and at what level our bids or 'enquiries' (as the BBC puts it) are.
  9. I will do. I'm commenting on the situation and the current evidence at the moment. If that changes then I'll comment on that as well.
  10. Possibly, presuming we actually get some of these players and we offer a half decent price for them.
  11. I would rather you didn't answer for me. In fact I would rather you just ignored my posts if you find them boring. Thanks.
  12. Because they are prepared to pay higher wages and transfer fees than us. There is no evidence which suggests otherwise.
  13. There is no chance of us beating Leicester to a signing. We have simply enquired.
  14. No he isn't. Got a good return in a struggling posh side in the npc.
  15. Our players in have reduced significantly in terms of Fees paid. We have spent less than we did in our first year and it will be interesting to see whether this continues this year considering that we have a greater need for players this year than last. We spent some money last year but nothing which could not be afforded with our crowds and otter sources of income. Things like bumper contracts to Lallana would be instantly recouped if we were to sell him at any time in the future so even if our financial backing has been reduced, it makes financial sense to give Lallana a decent contract.
  16. Cue MLG posting exactly what little fees we have spent in his tiring and pedantic manner.
  17. I passed on the info but am yet to be convinced by it.
  18. Freaky Fridayesque. Hypo is in exile on twitter and the lunatic is back in the asylum!
  19. Just a red flag then?
  20. First one above obviously better.
  21. Well done to baj for his closing comments on the last thread.
  22. I'm walking home, it is raining and I felt like posting on here. Thanks for the opinion though.
  23. I prefer the humorous contributions from the likes of essuruu personally.
  24. Why not have the investigation anyway? Corrupt tw*ts
  25. I missed a lot today! Seems the ban expired automatically but was then enforced by the mods. Calm down and carry on.
×
×
  • Create New...