hypochondriac

However bad Labour are I just cannot bring myself to vote for Cameron. There is something about him that I find odious and repugnant. Can't exactly put my finger on it but it's there ad everything he does just seems false to me.

I agree. The fact that he has now gone shows how much we are missing him IMO. I genuinely believe he tried to do what he thought was best for England (don't agree with everything he did but that's all I ask for from a leader because I am realistic.) I'm not sure I can say the same for Brown though.

He was quite happy for me to tell others about his views. I doubt he has anything to hide.

Both dark sotonic mills and 1 other pmd me to say that I had valid points and that if it was up to them it would be changed

Well then I have to ask at what point will things change? When quite a few choose not to renew? I think it makes sense to gain a consensus about where the forum is heading. It is run for us and we pay to use it so isnt it right that we should have a say?

But these issues were raised months ago and were just rejected.

Very true. I know that at least 2 (maybe three can't remember) mods/admin agree on this point.

I thought much the same. Every thread on the subject just descends into people taking the mickey. Bit sad IMO.

In the past there have been comments along the lines of "We are allowing you to use this site, it belongs to us." Just saying that this will undoubtedly changed now that we are all paying a fiver.

No reply?

Neither.

On average, we now get about 5 posts on the lounge per hour. It used to be much higher and thus the forum as a whole was a lot more interesting. It's quite sad.

There was certainly a lot lot more posts when it was just banter. As I said, the * rule worked well IMO.

So no then.

Yet one more person completely ignoring what I said. Did I say "Mclaggon is useless"? Or did I say he was useless yesterday? Two completely different things.

So now apart from the original poster not one person has sad he was excellent. I know who I would have my money on as someone who "Was watching a different game."

Why because you think a player plays badly in one game does that automatically mean that you think they are rubbish and being too negative?

Would you consider the third option in the poll?

I saw . I doubt very much that they would give me the power though. It gets very boring doing work sometimes and the arcade is a bit of a laugh! Anyway back on topic, having skimmed through the post match reaction thread, the marks for Mclaggon are 4,2,3,2,3,4. So it seems that you are in fact the minority and must have been watching a different game to the majority.

Thank you.

If you read people who hav rated the players in the post match reaction, most have given him a 5 or below (someone has given him a 2.)

And did I say that? Please read the posts properly before making yourself look silly. If I had said "he is useless" then you may have had a point.

I would argue that their achievements are roughly similar. Thing is he left Portsmouth in a much better position than when he got them and I bet you he does the same with Leicester. Where on earth will Rupes leave us?

Eh? He was useless yesterday!

The crucial difference is that Milan is prepared to invest his own money, something Lowe has never done.