hypochondriac

You know it's bad when MLG is spamming every twitter post related to this saga with damage control.

Imagine if we beat them and the result gets expunged...

Whilst I'm not overly happy about this as I've said, "professional recording equipment with a microphone"is obviously a mobile phone probably with a clip on mic. Funny to suggest it's more.

Boro getting Salty.

Which is why it was a stupid thing to do. Will probably cost us a lot of money for probably no benefit.

Plus if you're going to do it at least use someone not publically connected to the club for some plausible deniability for goodness sake.

I just think it's unnecessary. We have the talent and skill to beat Boro fairly on the pitch. We are the favourites for a reason and I don't think we should be giving them motivation of this sort even if the chances of it affecting the outcome are small. Plus I just don't really like shitty things like that in football. It goes against the English sense of fair play which is probably why I always hated shit like the Hand of God. Leave the low level cheating to the South Americans.

They don't have to be world beaters, they just have to beat a fellow championship team over two legs which they are obviously capable of doing.

Shock horror my opinion differs from yours. I'd rather keep a semblance of fair play thanks. I thought the same thing when Leeds did it.

I'm not worrying just pointing out a fact. Like I said it's a stupid thing to do. Marginal gains are a real thing and if we did actually send someone down to their training ground to covertly spy on them then I think that's a stupid thing to do. Not the greatest crime in history but not something that I think is really good either.

Well it's probably going to cost us hundreds of thousands of pounds at a minimum and likely to give our opponents a boost. Doesn't help us at all and makes it look like we can't win without cheating.

Bloody stupid thibg to do if true. Will have only succeeded in motivating their players.

We live in opposite world. I'd say that Tonda is more tactical with how he sets up and fluid with how he does things than any other of our managers in recent history. It's true he isn't wedded to a particular system like Martin but that's just dumb anyway and rigid. I saw some people on social media who said they'd watched some of our recent games but I'd very much argue that some of those matches we were managing games due to tiredness and just getting through.

The absolute staggering irony of fanaticists accusing others of false equivalence...

At least we can console ourselves with the club who nicked all our players going down.

Not sure they been touched it in the Spurs box.

In my opinion I've seen no clear dives that I can recall. I've seen a lot of times where a rival player has fouled him and his instinct is to go to ground to take the foul.

No offence Whitey and I do like you but you've been telling everyone that Bazunu was actually a decent keeper and just misunderstood so forgive me if I think you might just be the one in the wrong here.

I have rarely seen Scienza con a referee into giving a foul. He goes down a lot but that's because he gets fouled a lot.yes his instinct may be to go down when he gets fouled but that's just smart play imo.

Is it? I've seen him get legitimately fouled a whole bunch of times.

Indeed. I don't think anyone could seriously argue they will have gained a sporting advantage.

A fresh Downes will help with that. Hopefully Stephens back as well will help us be tighter.

Indeed. Management have to earn trust and when he was appointed and in January the trust was zero. If a Tonda left in the summer and we made a left field appointment I'd expect the majority of the fans to give them a chance and see where it goes because the club have earnt that.

That's what I thought too. It wasn't really a mistake in that sense.

He's resting the players that need a rest. Personally I d have played Edozie but I best hes one of the first on.