hypochondriac

I'm not sure I could name more than about 8 female pundits. I reckon a 50% pundit approval rating beats my percentage for male pundits so it's quite possible that I like a higher percentage of female pundits than male ones.

It makes zero sense to bring in a brand new manager and then someone comes in afterwards to oversee the whole operation. The new hire or hires will surely be involved in the new choice of manager.

There really is no point in sacking Hughes at the moment until we have someone with footballing knowledge to bring in a decent replacement.

Massive lol. Still peddling fantasies I see. I've named at least four I like and at no point have I referred to every female commentator. You just like to see the spectre of sexisn in every shadow. It's a weak trait. I'm sure female pundits are capable enough to fight their own battles without you white knighting for them.

Let's also remember the time that we sued Spurs over Alderweireld.

It's probably some club appointed PR agency. I'm not sure what the point is because it just riles up fans who have had their hopes raised unrealistically.

This isn't a Norway style deal is it.

I'm fed up of us leaking positive things to the media. The same thing happened with the Walcott ordeal and the promes deal. I'll believe it when I see it.

Sounds like we agree. Brexit is quite simple really, you're either in or you're out and this "deal" keeps us in but with no influence in the future. It's idiotic and anyone voting for it should be removed at the earliest opportunity.

That was the point of voting for brexit for many people. So that our laws are decided in the UK and so that laws can be changed once a government has been removed if they are unpopular.

The point is if you are happy to push this deal which surrenders our sovereignty in such an egregious manner then I don't want you anywhere near the levers of power.

It's worth taking a note of the tories falling into line and talking up this deal. If they are willing to sell their country down the river to stay in favour with their party then they don't deserve any sort of power.

It's interesting that the only people slightly happy about this deal is big business who rather than saying what a great deal it is, they are just saying they want some certainty. Hardly a ringing endorsement is it.

Erm no they aren't. Your intolerance and bigotry has blinded you to the reality.

People like this are far more close-minded than those who have legitimate criticisms of some female commentators. I don't see many people criticising them solely because of their gender? I also see posters being very critical of some male pundits too. Garth Crooks for instance is absolutely awful.

Yep and that's very true. I always found Victoria Pendleton and Rebecca Adlington not bad for swimming and cycling. It's not really the same when you have a woman's football player talking about their experiences as if it is in any way comparable.

Personally I think a lot of this theatre has been cooked up to prevent us leaving the EU. May and the people backing her deal know it won't pass Parliament. The EU will then make some sympathetic noises and offer some incentives for staying in. Imo that's been the plan for a while. What else were the likes of Blair talking to them about?

It's people arguing over semantics. Civil cases work "on the balance of probabilities" but beyond reasonable doubt is technically still a probability even if it isn't generally referred to as such.

Agree with all of that. Get some decent female pundits in and no one has a problem at all.

Is calling people gammon every five minutes supposed to be insulting? As insults go it's a pretty immature one. Not as pathetic as Jihadists granted but still sounds like you're on the playground.

Yep. Never minded sue barker either so there are some good ones about.

Agree with that. It's all about keeping the UK in by any meabs they can. There's a reason the top brass have had meetings with Blair, Sturgeon etc.

Tbf you could replace the word satisfaction there with probability and it would mean the same thing.

I think remain would win convincingly. I also find it profoundly depressing that the result of the first referendum and subsequent general election would be overturned before the result has been implemented. Effectively says that no matter what happens, it is impossible to leave the EU properly and admits that the EU already has so much power and control that there is nothing we can do about it. Hardly anyone pushing for another vote or saying we should remain in has had anything positive to say about that prospect, rather they have just said how any other alternative is a bad one. How depressing.

Sounds like soggy would have done a better job as the defence team!