hypochondriac

Had a cursory glance of the first three pages and those were the two with the most replies. If not the two biggest then certainly up there.

Just had a look on the ugly and I saw that pap has posted on there with a link to his site. The fact that his two biggest threads are about this place and about bashing the Tories doesn't exactly disprove some of the theories from here...

No one said he wouldn't and good luck to him. Shurlock's post is entirely correct though.

shurlock we have had our differences and will continue to have them but that is one hell of a post. I agree with every word.

It's the forum that Pap started when he was kicked off of here. A couple of the funny ones and a load of the borderline communist posters went over there too. As I mostly come here for saints news and opinions this serves its purpose for me. If you want to debate left wing propaganda and give the tories a kicking then I expect you would be better catered for over there.

It was called banter central then. Crab lungs and cabbage face were great although I wasn't a huge fan of tubgirl it has to be said.

Both reasons to avoid it. Shame about bearsy and tokyo though. They were always a laugh.

To be fair Cologne may have been bad but it's nothing compared to the wild west that is Maidstone on a Saturday night.

And original Bournemouth saint...

We've taken children and other migrants in, why focus on this particular group of children? I'm sure we will continue to take those in need from syria whilst avoiding doing something that would encourage more to come over here. It's been proven to be the correct tactic considering what happened after Germany let everyone in.

Meh it's a forum. I doubt Turkish is being serious...

Not according to his autobiography.

Let's put the nations security and authority on the global stage at risk to take in 3000 children and potentially encourage loads more to make the dangerous journey. Good idea soggy.

Just like Le tiss then.

I refer you to my previous answer you loon: Do you just not bother to read anymore?

It's pretty obvious who the winners will be. Adkins vs Strachan would be good though.

Rubbish. He stayed with us when he could have easily jumped ship to join the hammers and was a huge reason for our promotions both on the pitch and behind the scenes. It's fully deserved and I'll be going and cheering him on.

I won't be putting anyone on ignore. As I already said to you, I'll continue to call you out on your falsehoods and hold you to account when you post rubbish. That won't change regardless of how many times you demean yourself by suggesting I have a mental illness or pretending you've put me on ignore. But keep on pretending that the reason you are being laughed at is for saying that most Muslims are peaceful and not rapists, if you say it enough times you might get someone else to believe you.

No copying needed. Since day one you have been asked to substantiate some of your outlandish claims and you were unable to do so. Your tactic then became not answering the questions, pretending you had answered them, ignoring the people asking you questions, claiming to put those people on ignore, questioning the sanity of those asking you questions, pretending that those asking you questions are all part of some coordinated attack against you, pretended that people have just jumped on the bandwagon to have a go at you, claiming you were just exaggerating to make a point etc etc. It has the appearance of "running away" because you done all you can to avoid them. What you've done consistently is write some ill informed opinion, people will ask you for details and argue against your position, you will claim it's not for you to provide the answers just pose the questions and then argue with them up until the time that they make a point that you can't or won't answer. You then ignore that point and jump to the next ill informed opinion. It's unlikely but anyone who is bothered enough to read this thread in its entirety (and the homosexual footballers one before it.) will come to that same conclusion.

If I haven't answered any questions of yours then it will be because I haven't seen them or you have missed my reply. Unlike you I don't run away or pretend I have already answered something.

What are you on about? Modern day Chelsea is at least as big as three of those teams. Certainly in terms of resources. I can't think of anyone who would turn Chelsea down because they aren't big enough.

It's all just made up and the silent majority agree with soggy. We know that's true because only the people who disagree post things and besides, anyone who does disagree is all part of the same clique of people that have got together and decided to think the same things. Everyone knows that.

So you're accusing Guan of jumping on a bandwagon rather than having independently arrived at the conclusion that you were making things up? It figures you would think that rather than think that a number of people considered you a liar. I think the last few posts from me have proven that I'm not running away from answering question unlike yourself. I'll reply to who I like thanks, running away hasn't stopped you from being held to account, neither has asking for proof or claiming to put me on ignore so I'm not sure why you think your new tactic of questioning my sanity is going to work either. You keep making up things that people have said and I'll continue to point it out.

They were most likely ground down by what you posted. They disagreed with you and many accused you of fabricating stuff as I have. It's quite clear why people have a problem with your posts, the evidence is in all the posts you have written in this thread. If you can't see it despite me dredging half of them up and spelling it out for you then there is no hope.

You asked me to show you the evidence, I provide the evidence and you then accuse me of obsession. The very definition of running away with your fingers in your ears which I am sure you have been accused of before.