true, nothing in that brief report saying anyone outside of the club has criticised him at all.
There is such thing as positive criticism - guessing article will be something like management team happy with his workman like performances in midfield but felt he had more quality attacking and should get goals - and he has answered them with two in two games.
Just take link as advert rather than a report in its own right
he has not made any excuses as no right minded person criticised his performance, and luckily he probably wasn't aware of the minority on here who were.
what I don't understand is that other smaller clubs got bigger crowds tonight?
Sunderland - not a sleeping giant but they got 28,000
Spurs - not a club famed for its great loyal fanbase like the skates got 36,000
Barnsley 20,000
Skates thro to 1/4 finals - could be getting some extra, much needed cash in.
Stoke sold their full allocation for the game (not sure how many?) but even with this they only managed 11,000 crowd.
the win did only come after the change of system.
the previous games were won with the system
the first 30 mins of MK game was with 4-5-1 (4-3-3) and was one of the most one sided starts to a game (against the in-form team in the league) that I have seen.
Its bizarre as our manager changed tactics a few games ago, since then we have played well and won our games - and yet some are still seeking to criticise him for it!
as it seems he doesn't go, I wonder if its personal reasons - or after his 5 minutes of fame he is less interested in supporting saints?
Seems very strange after his speeches about how we needed to save the club to support??
think he was more saying that as justice minister he knows the law and can assure him that explaining why he changed his mind on the denial would not warrant a prosecution