Jimmy_D

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?41286-Newcastle-build-up-thread

He won us the only trophy I've been alive to see us win. I'll certainly be giving him a good welcome.

So in other words, the other 9 workmates are getting their £100 back (minus £2.50) and instead putting that £100 into one share... Between them they're adding £22.50 to the PST's finances (On top of what the PST already had in their account) How many seconds does that pay the administrator for?

This is just speculation going round in circles now. Start a new thread if there's a more solid link to Saints.

It's like politics; the PST know that the figures aren't adding up, not enough pledges are being converted, but if they admit that things aren't going well, even more people will be discouraged from their cause and it'll snowball even faster. Hence, the full on noises from them about how well it's all going.

Pompey would still hold the player's registration until the transfer window reopens. Would imagine that Pompey would rather open up a space in the 20 player limit by mutually terminating the contract, leaving him as a free agent, than hold on to a player (or just his registration) when he doesn't want to be there. That'd just leave Pompey with one less space, the player with resentment, and make Pompey even less(!) attractive to potential players, if they're willing to screw over one of their own like that. Any fee, if there's any, will be nominal.

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?41323-JWP-signs-5-year-deal Indeed there is good news.

Excellent news

http://www.saintsweb.co.uk/showthread.php?14620-Pompey-Takeover-Saga/page1555

It's like they've got McClaren in charge again

Cork I reckon. We've looked a completely different team with him playing.

YES! That'll do.

It's getting ridiculous now. Not content with shafting the local businesses, charities, and every single taxpayer in the country, now they've actively agreed a preferential rate to encourage their own fans to go into debt, just before Christmas, in order to allow the club to stagger on for a little longer.

Administrators aren't generally in the business to give money away...

What she fails to mention is that monies 'returned to the club' will be distributed to creditors of the liquidated company Baker Tilly are overseeing.

So in other words, a consortium of Property Developers are buying some land with a decrepit building on it, and a bunch of fans have donated to collecting buckets to keep a tinpot club going for a little longer?

Yes, but your higher one off prices aren't to buy a 'bigger' club, they're to pay off even more debt. Including to charities.

My gut feeling is that this is due to Saints having a ruthless business strategy these days. Bills don't get paid until the latest possible time (to allow interest to accrue, etc.), the cheapest possible suppliers are picked (e.g. the programme printers being based in Portsmouth now), any unnecessary staff are let go (the programme sellers), any hangers on are given nothing for free (MLT and other former players). Every last penny is chased. I don't like it, I think goodwill is an important (but intangible) asset for a business to have, but I think it's more a case of being unwilling to pay until as late as possible, rather than being unable to pay. This is a relatively small amount of money, and if there were problems on that front, other signs would be there, such as late payment of wages.

It'll make it even funnier to watch his breakdown yet again when they do deduct the points.

The new company is already being used. The old one is the one Baker Tilley are liquidating and investigating.

It seems silly to me that a one off bump caused by the Olympic Games etc. to bring us out of recession, followed by dropping back to the current natural level, is seen as worse than if we'd just stayed in one long dip for the whole time...

What about the nuke POL dropped on the New Forest? The fall out even blew out over The Solent and got a few of their own as well...

RIP Eric

It's worth remembering that Appleton, for all his tactical failings once the players were out on the pitch, was able to attract those decent players in the first place, considering Pompey's position. Some of them will have been there for the money(!), by the look of it, but others will have just lost the main reason they were there at all. Oh look, they've not been tied to a long term contract, and there's a transfer window about to open.

I did. It was nothing more than a trolling post going on about Saints trying to derail the thread. I'd have probably let it slide if things were quiet, but the thread is very much on topic at the moment.