Jump to content

stevegrant

Administrators
  • Posts

    9,710
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by stevegrant

  1. To be fair, there's another year and a bit until sanctions will start to be imposed - plenty of time for most clubs to be adjusting their budgets. Pompey are probably ****ed regardless of this latest development.
  2. Not quite. Teams who remain in the Football League at the end of the season (i.e. not promoted to the Premier League) will be subject to a transfer embargo - the article I've read is a bit ambiguous here, but there's a chance that embargo would last for a whole year, similar to the one the SPL/SFA have handed Rangers this week (only allowed to sign players under the age of 18 ). It is only those who are promoted to the Premier League who would be subject to the "Fair Play Tax" at a sliding scale depending on the amount of the loss above the "acceptable deviation". Here's an example: Say an entirely fictional club, East Cheese City, were promoted to the Premier League in the 2015/16 season (when the target "acceptable deviation" will be a £2m loss), having made an annual loss of £10m. That's £8m over the "acceptable deviation". On the sliding scale (1% for £100k losses, 100% for £10m+), that would equate to an 80% "tax" by the Football League, so that club would have to contribute £6.4m out of its revenue from the next season (i.e. its Premier League money) into the Fair Play fund, which would then get distributed evenly among the clubs remaining in the Football League who were fully compliant with the regulations.
  3. On the face of it, that argument looks weak, but dig a bit deeper and you see an underlying problem... the likes of Habib Beye on a 5-year contract at £50k a week, discarded by O'Neill himself after a couple of months, Steve Sidwell was on a similar amount and they had to give him a big pay-off to take a pay cut and move to Fulham. Plenty of other examples as well.
  4. To be honest, for Michael Appleton at Pompey, read Nigel Pearson at Saints. Took us from comfortably mid-table to staying up with 20 minutes to go, yet appears to be hero-worshipped by many
  5. It's nothing of the sort, it's a realisation that games at this stage of the season tend to be of the win-or-bust variety, and if Davis were to get injured or sent off after 15 minutes of a vital game, we might as well kiss the game goodbye. Even West Ham, who haven't had a keeper on the bench all season (and got lucky when Rob Green was sent off at Blackpool with the opposition failing to register a shot on target against Henri Lansbury), have named Henderson among the subs a couple of times recently. The "should we name a keeper on the bench" conundrum only exists because of the ridiculous decision to revert to only five substitutes this season - it won't even be a discussion point next season as we'll have enough options with seven subs to name a sub keeper every time.
  6. Not much chance that Puncheon will come in from the cold straight into the first-team for this sort of game. Outside chance of being on the bench, I guess, but I'd fully expect Guly to start (with Richardson coming back in at right-back, hopefully), with de Ridder as an option from the bench in the second half.
  7. I'd have Bart on there just in case - this game is far too important. I don't understand why we had such a defensively-minded bench at Middlesbrough though, did we really need both Harding and Martin there, leaving ourselves with only one attacking option? Martin should be on there as the defensive cover, but Jack Cork is adequate as cover for the full-back positions. That would have allowed us to have the alternative attacking option of de Ridder as well as Guly.
  8. I can't imagine he'll simply walk away for nothing, knowing that there's not a cat in hell's chance he'll be getting £50k a week (including image rights) anywhere else. His exit will still come at a cost to Pompey, although certainly not as much as if he'd stayed for the last year of his contract.
  9. As I said on the other thread, have the night off.
  10. Have a night off.
  11. Given the £12m received from Chamberlain which will be in this season's accounts (transfer fees received are accounted for immediately, unlike transfer fees paid), we'd have had to have awarded some ludicrous contracts to new signings to go above 93% this season, IMO. Add in an extra £4-5m in TV revenue, increased season ticket revenue with the 30% price rise, increased attendances, etc.
  12. Madejski has said in the press that he won't be renegotiating, saying "a deal is a deal". I suspect he's just desperate to take the responsibility off his shoulders now.
  13. No, those figures were based on last season. They're nearly a year out of date now, and since then we've made a number of relatively high-profile signings and given existing first-team players new contracts.
  14. Reading didn't pay £3m for Roberts, did they?!
  15. Like the man with the orthopaedic shoes, I stand corrected
  16. I don't think Redknapp scored for us in the PL, definitely got one in the FA Cup at Northampton, but no league goals IIRC. Same with Le Saux, scored at Bristol City in the League Cup but no league goals. Beattie didn't score for England, so he doesn't count either. Nor did Kevin Phillips, surprisingly. Peter Crouch Wayne Bridge Kerry Dixon
  17. I wouldn't say that's trolling, it's a fact. If we weren't going for promotion, we'd have taken 1000 to Middlesbrough on Saturday at the very most, the terrace at Peterborough wouldn't have been packed for a midweek game, and even the 600-odd we took to Hull is double what we'd have taken there if we were midtable with nothing to play for.
  18. I think the 13/8 figure is for promotion via any means, which would of course also include the playoffs.
  19. 319 was the in-vision football vidi-printer, I believe
  20. That was what Steve Cotterill and David Lampitt said. How did that work out for you?
  21. Don't suppose you kept the one about Reading's new not-in-any-way-identical-to-Gaydamak owner, did you?
  22. Is it just me or has the rumafia website been shut down?
  23. The Tapatalk plugin has been upgraded, please check it's now working
  24. OK, the Tapatalk plugin has now been upgraded
  25. Sorry, no, still not done. Two reasons, I've been feeling a bit crap over the weekend and I think Baj has our login details to download the Tapatalk upgrade. As soon as I've got those login details, I should be able to get it done quite quickly.
×
×
  • Create New...