stevegrant

Given McGoldrick's recent run of first-team goals, I'd now be inclined to agree with you on that one. Previously, DM hadn't shown that he could score goals at this level, so he couldn't be relied upon as the "pacey" option up front. Wright-Phillips has had that role pretty much since he arrived at the club and managed to keep a place at least in the 16 if not in the starting 11 on the basis that he was the only option for an injection of pace up front. It's entirely possible that we now have a better option in McGoldrick. It is also, however, entirely possible that this is a never-to-be-repeated purple patch for him...

Logic would dictate that this reported "interest" is complete ********. Why would anyone be pursuing him now, given that less than 6 weeks ago they could have got him for a relative pittance through a tribunal? Given that John Bostock, a 16-year-old with the likely potential to play for the full England side, something I suspect Dyer hasn't got, was only valued at £700k by the tribunal panel, we'd have been lucky to get £500k for Dyer.

On the other hand, it encourages people to buy in advance (a lot of CCC clubs do it for league games, let alone cup games) so the club can prepare enough staff to cover the anticipated attendance.

I think I'd have to ban myself if I commented on this topic...

Now THAT would be a coup... Not sure what I think about the Adams link, generally the bloke's been a complete **** in games against us, but I guess he's the sort of character you want on your side rather than against you.

Do you ever not have one of those moments? I think it's probably more a case of "business as usual", really. The club has to assume that those players are available to us until such time as they move elsewhere.

Yes. I shouldn't be hungover this week

Yes it is.

Because it doesn't suit certain peoples' agendas.

Again, where's the relevance? If anything, the situation we're in would suggest the ideal person to at least keep our heads above the water is someone who doesn't have any sort of sentiment to cloud their judgement.

Excellent, should be game over now.

LOL... right on cue, they have a goal disallowed

Really, what difference does it make? Does it inspire extra confidence in the players? No. They couldn't give a ****. Does it inspire extra confidence in the fans that are there? No. They couldn't give a ****.

Swansea 2-0 Brentford Wolves 1-1 Accrington Stanley

Possession stats are usually inaccurate, don't know why they continue to be used. Dagenham 1-1 Reading, by the way. Thought you might appreciate that one

Bristol City 1-1 Peterborough

Macclesfield 2-0 Blackpool

Swindon 2-3 QPR

Ipswich 4-1 Leyton Orient

Ipswich 4-0 Leyton Orient

Indeed. Palace 1-1 Hereford Swindon 2-2 QPR

Palace 0-1 Hereford

Half-times: Bournemouth 1-2 Cardiff Bristol City 0-1 Peterborough Bury 0-1 Burnley Charlton 0-1 Yeovil Crewe 2-0 Barnsley Crystal Palace 0-0 Hereford Dagenham & Redbridge 0-1 Reading Derby 0-0 Lincoln Exeter 0-1 Saints Ipswich 3-0 Leyton Orient Luton 1-0 Plymouth Macclesfield 1-0 Blackpool MK Dons 1-0 Norwich Notts County 0-0 Doncaster Preston 1-0 Chesterfield Sheff Weds 1-1 Rotherham Swansea 1-0 Brentford Swindon 2-1 QPR Watford 0-0 Bristol Rovers Wolves 0-1 Accrington Stanley Some pretty interesting scores there!

Crewe 2-0 Barnsley

MK Dons 1-0 Norwich