egg

You've gone full on batshit recently Matthew. Perhaps have a think before you post some of the stuff that fills your head. Just a thought.

Yep, and do it across all sports with none of this competing under a neutral or different flag nonsense.

Absolutely no point mate. You'll babble on about stats and other shit, but refuse to acknowledge the obvious namely that Howe has done a superb job getting an average centre forward, average CB, our former reserve LB and a decent midfielder playing and winning. I'll forget the other full back as he's largely been injured. As has been said, money alone does not buy success and Everton have been highlighted as an example. I'll engage no more with you as I have better things to do. Enjoy the sunshine.

Thanks 👍

Wood wouldn't get in most premier league teams, and people mocked them for buying Dan Burn. Bruno was only £35m because it was Newcastle paying with its blood money, and they were desperate. That said, he's a cracking player. Eddie Howe deserves enormous credit for getting them motivated, playing, and winning.

All possible 🤞🙏🤞

Stone

Flat

Bargain

You're struggling to understand that people don't want to debate this with you. It's tiresome. I say by way of comment only that reference to God does not have to mean the God of the Bible. Or indeed any God, often a term of expression with people refer to something they don't understand, or necessarily believe in. The extension of that is the irony that the God of your 'understanding' is a God that you don't understand or believe in. As I say, it's comment, not the starter for a discussion.

It's pretty straightforward to the rest of us mate.

He always does. When he's left to largely think on his feet he comes across brilliantly. It's when he's shoved in front of a camera with his script he sounds shit.

Workshop

I've tried to be civil her mate, but you've shown yourself to be a properly insensitive cunt with no self awareness. Like The Kraken, I'm out, and won't waste my time engaging any further with you on the subject.

Well said, and my thoughts entirely.

That you can't see the crassness of your posts says rather more about you than about those who've commented on them. "When you're likely to dig yourself a deeper hole, best put down your shovel" said many a wise man to many an idiot.

That's a classy touch. At times like this, rivalries must be put to one side. I can't imagine how he and his wife must feel, just awful.

You've made yourself look more of an idiot than usual here MLG. Sometimes it's best to say nothing. This was one of them times.

Handbags

13 year revival! Some blasts from the past on there. On topic, I favour a good old fashioned hammer and chisel.

From what you posted. You've said you expect us to get better for less money than we pay Forster. Unless they're free, we'd be paying a fee, but even free there'll likely be a signing on fee. Factoring that in, I'm not sure who you expect to get for less money who'll do better. You've seemingly changed your point to that you'd like us to splash cash on a better keeper. I'm with you on that, but transfer budget is not known and I'd hazard a guess we won't have masses to spend. If it came down, for example, to keeping Forster and spending cash on a another 10, or getting another keeper and not getting a 10, I'd be happy to keep him.

So cheaper, better, and presumably free. You don't want much!

So we're back to this nonsense. It's reasonable to assume that Forster is affordable to us, and that a better keeper would cost more. Thus, it's hardly controversial to suggest that we'd struggle to get better if Forster's wages are the level of our budget.

Contraction

Grinder