egg

Wow. Got the ball. Not a follow through as his leg was naturally there from winning the ball. Appalling decision.

With Stephens at RB? Makes more sense than Stephens at LB. That's assuming it's a 4.

Yep, I think it's a possibility. Gulp.

Me neither. I'm guessing it's either a 4 with Stephens at LB where Castagne will destroy him, or a 3 with someone (Redmond?!?) at left wing back.

There seems a clear case to answer here. Sensible decision.

Both had awful luck, Seager especially. After his injuries, he went to Havant & Waterlooville where they thought he'd do well but a close family member got very ill and it hit him hard. I was told that he still had something but it wasn't to be. McQueen's situation sounds like he has other injuries flowing from his surgeries which aren't sorting themselves out. Real shame for him.

Sad news for the lad. Hard to imagine where his head will be at and I wish him well.

Tropical

Just looked it up, yep. Didn't realise that, thought he was just a conspiracy loon.

Fantasy

Yeah. "Exciting update" with an exclamation mark or two would have filled me with hope for the lad. Let's see, but fingers crossed for him.

I never saw him play, any good?

Daft to link doing up a flat up and giving out billions of pounds of moody covid contracts. Completely different things, and seeing one as the same as the other is silly. I wouldn't seek to suggest Boris has integrity, he's as dodgy as they come, but a bit of perspective is needed about this issue.

Political parties take donations, and if some of that finds itself into renovations or general party contributions, I'm not sure that it matters. If it finds its way to the former, it's a saving to the tax payer. We see it differently, but for me, this isn't a big issue.

Possibly, Starmer is a bright lad and often approaches PMQ,s as if it's cross examination. Boris is so dishonest its highly possible that Starmer will trip him up at some point.

Yep, you'd have to be mental to buy us. You'd never get your money back, and you'd have to pump in tens of millions to improve us but you'd never get that back either. Think how Gao feels having seen tens of millions spunked on our shit signings.

What will be interesting is the news reel of all his PMQ kickings from Starmer where he's squirmed and been disingenuous. Today will help with that if nothing else. Whether Boris is needed is academic as he ain't going anywhere any time soon.

To be fair I haven't seen any pics, and my understanding is that there's a £30k allowance to decorate etc. The issue is whether it's an issue for a donor to pay for the works rather than the incumbent or the tax payer. For me, I'd rather a donor than me.

Now there's trolling, and there's just being a cock.

No idea Tim, my comment related to today in Parliament and the flat. I'm no Boris fan/tory by the way, but Labour have more interest in this point than the wider public do I suspect. Starmer was great today, but it'll get him and labour nowhere.

It's gone to improve a public asset, its hardly buying Boris a yacht. It'll be declared, Boris has form for being tardy about these things. Storm in a teacup for me.

Good of you to tell me what I should care about, but I really don't and need not. Political parties take donations. We know that. If the donation goes via, or bypasses, the party and ends up funding renovations I really don't mind.

Yep, battered him all around the chamber. The 4 simple choices question was brilliant. With that said, I couldn't care less who paid for the flat as long as it wasn't the tax layer.

Well there'll be goals I'd imagine, and I fancy us to score at least one of them. I'll go for an entertaining 2-2 draw. Adams and Vestergaard.

To be fair, West Ham would be a good move for Ings. Bigger fan base, better squad, Europe, etc. This is possibly his last big move and he can't be criticised if he goes.