egg

In my experience, social distancing on shops etc is all but non existent now people are masked up. When masks weren't being worn, people were more cautious. How much difference that all makes, I don't know, but if people become used to being casual in one environment, perhaps they are more casual when not mask wearing.

That's got to be right. Vestergaard is a shocker and any sensible bid for him should see him go you'd think.

You'd be amazed how loose lipped some people are, however important their role is. One recently ish departed senior person at our club was, and I've since heard things that flow from within.

That's good business if the figures are correct. Take the loyalty bonus out of the Hoj fee though, agents, the KWP add inns, the loan fee we will have previously paid, and I suspect that we're not actually up much money.. That all said, I like KWP and think he'll do well for us. I think Hoj is underrated but we've shown we can live without him.

The fella said he was useless. He was/is but it doesn't alter that what he did in that one game was vital. It's irrelevant what someone else may have done, they didn't do it. It's no big deal, but I'm not sure why you're going out of your way to verify that a shit player is/was shit when nobody suggested otherwise.

To go from splashing I did too. I wander if Howe wants time out of the game and Tindall didn't want to hang around. Either way, the appointment feels to be a cheap and unambitious choice.

Blimey, that's crazy money. There aren't many who slip through our net, but it looks like he did.

A batsman getting one run in an innings, in a game where hundreds of runs are scored, is completely different to a goal in a low scoring football match. The fella's point is more sensible than yours.

Filth

Do you honestly believe that people believe you're itk? Your BS can be smelt through cyberspace.

Hands

Sexual

He did. Josh Sims was a close second in his mind. He also loved Jake Hesketh. Bless.

Magic

It's either the resurrection of Jesus or John Lennon. Either way, it's a decent looking bit of toast.

👍😂🥪 God bless you.

Trousers, some cracking toasters there. You got a link to the pale green one please?

1. I don't get chased down blind allies that lead to a debate beyond the present subject. I've answered every relevant question, and with an actual answer, not another question as per. 2. Make your mind up. One minute you want evidence of gods existence, the next you say that you don't claim that God doesn't exist, now you question whether God is tangible or intangible. 3. I'll bite and answer with a question as that's apparently acceptable form. Would anything less than evidence of a tangible God be evidence to you of God's existence? I'm intrigued to no where you set the bar. 4. Apples and Pears. 5.i read your words and understand them. You don't believe in God, but don't believe that God doesn't exist, thus you are by self admission a persuadable agnostic but don't belive in the concept of agnosticism. I've got all that.

This is tedious. You do not believe in God, something intangible. Proof in the scientific sense is not possible, hence in your mind, there is no proof. I'm going to work on the presumption of existence, and I'll leave you to provide the evidence to support your claim of non existence...if indeed that is your claim as I'm lost on what your point is tbh.

Hmm. That's your take on it. I'd say given that we are in a COE country, that Christianity is the focus in most schools, that millions worldwide believe in a God, that the presumption is that there is a God. If you think that presumption is rebuttable, the ball is in your court to prove it. Given that you're not claiming (apparently) that there isn't a God, I'm not sure where you're going with this.

Then what's the point that you're trying to make?! You're not claiming that God doesn't exist, others are not claiming God doesn't exist. We're all agreed. Great. Move on. Have a cuppa.

1.You appear to believe that only Christians believe in God. I have never read the Bible, I am not a Christian. 2.There are nutters in all walks of life, seemingly on mongboards too. 3.It has been a point of yours that people who do so for selfish reasons, ie to heal, for themselves, etc. That demonstrates your complete lack of understanding. 4.I fully understand what you have said. You know it too, but are as stubborn as you are closed minded.

Under

Indeed. His assumption is that those who believe in God see him as the creator. He's also babbled on that those who believe won't take medical attention if they're ill as they apparently believe that God will sort them out. He also believe that those who pray will pray for themselves. His position is based on his assumptions, arrogance,lack of understanding, and inability to accept that people are entitled to views which differ to his. Each to their own etc.

Lack of evidence of the existence of something is not evidence of the lack of existence. More to the point, people can believe in what they want. It doesn't matter that you don't share that belief - you're not God.