Jump to content

egg

Subscribed Users
  • Posts

    16753
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by egg

  1. Valery had never played right wing back before he made his debut. Ditto Ramsey. Ditto JWP until he kept the mighty Zaha in his pocket and then scored the winner. Its not a traditional position, and anyone playing there has to adapt to the role. You make it sound like asking a midfielder (who has played there) to play there is akin to trying to get Charlie Austin playing in goal or Redmond at CB. You're the wettest of wet fannies mate, dry up ffs.
  2. Sensible words. It beggars belief that anyone can't see this. The cost of him buggering off and needing replacing will far outweigh the cost of Cedric for the rest of the season. The club would bend over backwards to keep Ralph, not bend him over as people seem to think.
  3. Wise words.
  4. We'll agree to differ on that. The saving on Cedric alone wouldn't go anywhere near the cost of another manger change. I think you're confusing your disappointment of the window with RH.
  5. Do you seriously think that after all our management upheavals, and payouts, the board would sell players that RH wants and/or leave him with a squad that he isn't happy with? Really?
  6. I don't rate Long but I can't see the pressing game working with Austin. He's a great finisher and his winner against Arsenal shows he has ability still. As he's here I've no doubt RH will use him.
  7. It's not true. It's Deppo. It's a wind up.
  8. Long. Austin can't run. Gallagher isn't good enough. Obafemi too raw.
  9. Deppo ???
  10. Exactly. The bloke would have joined knowing the likely transfer position, and won't hang around if the board tuck him up. Sad reality is that the noisy minority on here think know more than the manager they claim to have faith in.
  11. He returned as he was injured. Doubtless RH then wanted to take a look at him.
  12. Nah. Mendy on the mend, Danilo, Zinchenko plus Delph. Not sure where he'd end up tbh... Arsenal perhaps?
  13. Ha!! Injured, apparently.
  14. The prospect of Bertrand going is nuts. Vokins isn't good enough back up and Johnson can't defend. I was relaxed about our departures but if this is true we'll have a paper thin squad.
  15. That's your opinion. They were not in RH plans. They were deadwood.
  16. That's your opinion, but by not featuring in RH plans they were deadwood.
  17. No fan should bet against their team, ever. That said, I'm not as optimistic as the bookies.
  18. Our wage bill is not an 'ancillary cost'. It is massive and represents our biggest expenditure item. Seeking to draw comparisons between our finances and those of our peers is pointless when you are unaware of our finances or theirs. The reality, contrary to popular belief, is that we have spent a shed load of cash on players, agents, wages etc thus its obvious that we are not rolling in cash. Whether other clubs are in the same position is irrelevant.
  19. If course it doesn't, people always forget that. And wages. And running costs of the club. And tax. Etc.
  20. Shocking player and by far the worst signing over the past couple of windows for me. I've not seen one sign of promise, or positive attribute. He looks slow, shows no skill, no movement or anything a decent player should.
  21. You mean like £19m for Carillo, whatever it was for Hoedt and Moi etc? They were targets and we paid top dollar. The issue isn't money, nobody can seriously suggest we haven't splashed the cash, the issue is scouting players that are good enough. I'm not sure if Maehle or the guy playing in Greece would improve us.
  22. egg

    Che Adams

    That assumes we have 15 - 20m to spend...
  23. He was a great prospect until injury. Hopefully he can cut it at a lower level, good luck to the lad.
  24. egg

    Che Adams

    Promes, apparently, is that it?! As for the remainder, we agree that we are able to sign players, and that we do so. That some players turn out to be rubbish is a secondary issue - more scouting than ambition/financial.
  25. egg

    Che Adams

    What players have we bid for that aren't for sale? Seems an odd allegation. It's utter ****** to suggest that we can't sign players. We have a bloated squad cos we've signed too many!! Truth is a lot of them are sh1te, but this line that we can't or don't sign players is ******.
×
×
  • Create New...