egg

Dunno. I thought it was infinite. If it's not, I'm intrigued what's at end/sides. Must be like the world in the Trueman show.

It was your comment!

That's an alternative theory. Walls around the sides?

People can believe in creationism re the universe, and the scientific view after the initial creation, and believe in a God or not. There's theories and beliefs beyond the book of Genesis. I don't get why people think it's a binary choice of that idea, or the wholly scientific one.

Indeed. Or, conversely, may have evolved as developed for thousands or millions of years, thus have technologies and scientific advances that we can't even contemplate - we went from the Wright Brothers to Space in 58 years. We only know what we know, and have.

Shouting

That's your perspective. Seems close minded to me. Each to their own.

Hmm. Conflating ideas for me. It's Entirely possible to believe in God but not aliens, and vice versa, or both, or neither.

Why need "certain" to believe in the likelihood of something probable? Do you honestly believe that in the infinity of the universe that there's no other life?

Err, ok. You're thinking of the book, and conflating concepts. I've got a physicist mate who believes in the creationist theory, and no plenty of atheists/agnostics who believe in either creationist or big bang.

Girls

Yep. I had a friend (since passed) who moved to Oz. The most straightforward and honest guy you'd ever meet. He talked of being by the sea in Noosa and everyone stopped to look at a huge thing in the sky, silent and still, then watching it move away silently at an "other worldly" speed. He died skint and used all he had to commission a picture of what he saw for his daughter. Absolutely no reason to doubt what he said he saw.

Ha!! I couldn't imagine how it would be to find it necessary to have clear and tangible evidence of everything.

Not sure why God gets mentioned on an Aliens thread. Odd. Re, Aliens, it's incomprehensible that we're the only civilised life form in an infinite universe.

That's exactly it. There's a player in there, and Tonda clearly wanted him to get some minutes in, and boost his confidence. Playing him off the big man should have taken the pressure off a bit as well. Fair to say it didn't go well.

... Broken link.

Chow-mein

Agreed. And if it keeps it on terrestrial TV.

Today's rugby.

Yep. Loaning out your best RB to a promotion rival was mental.

Sadly, yes. As you posted, on a human level you have to feel for the lad, but from a fans perspective you've got to wonder what he brings.

Yep. That game couldn't have worked out any better for the sqaud, and kids, Archer being he exception.

If that sitter went in I suspect we'd have seen a very different player. He's a confidence player, without confidence.

That was nice. Match won Kids blooded Key players rested That's a win, win, win

Yep. This will do them the world of good, and we get to see them against half decent players. Tonda